Why Video Games Sustain Engagement: A Cage Match between Social Learning Theories

Brock Dubbels

The Center for Cognitive Sciences

Department of Curriculum & Instruction

The University of Minnesota

Abstract: Although games are seen as high interest activities, many children buy them, play them, and move on to another activity. This represents a challenge in creating instructional interventions to achieve an educational outcome or a training effect. This study was conducted to inform an after school program designed to deliver a training effect on female adolescent health. To investigate this, a small sample of young female experts were recruited and interviewed for rich phenomenological descriptions (van Manen, 2002) to examine the aspects engagement as described by (Chapman 2006) as informed through identity construction (Buckingham, 2007, Van Gennep, 1960; Turner, 1969). Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using methods from discourse analysis (Gee, 1992, 1996, 1999; Fairclough, 2007) using themes from social learning theories such as Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1996), Affinity Groups (Gee, 2001), Positive Interdependence (Deutsch, 1962, Johnson & Johnson, 1989), and Self-Determination (Ryan and Deci, 2008). Implications of this study include understanding the importance of identity construction to motivate and sustain engagement in learning.

Key terms: Dance Dance Revolution, Phenomenology, Identity Construction, Self-Determination Theory, Affinity Groups, Motivation, Engagement, Social Learning, Instructional Design, Rites of Passage, Play, Games, Initiation, Semiotic Domains, Apprenticeship, Transformation.

Citation:

Dubbels, B.R. (2010) Designing Learning Activities for Sustained Engagement — Four Social Learning Theories Coded and Folded into Principals for Instructional Design through Phenomenological Interview and Discourse Analysis. In Discoveries in Gaming Research. IGI Global Publishers.


Introduction

This article seeks to understand what engages young people in learning, and what sustains their interest to continue. It was intended to explore the elements that inform the lived experience of a chosen play activity and examine the possible social learning theories that might inform it. Five social learning theories were examined to ground the aspects engagement as described by (Chapman 2006) and informed through social learning theories such as Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1996), Affinity Groups (Gee, 2001), Positive Interdependence (Deutsch, 1962, Johnson & Johnson, 1989), and Self-Determination (Ryan and Deci, 2008). Implications of this study include understanding the importance of identity construction to motivate and sustain engagement in learning (Buckingham, 2007, Van Gennep, 1960; Turner, 1969).

All of the theories listed above seek to explain the motivation behind learning as socially constructed and distributed phenomena; all seek to describe the process of identity construction as an impetus for situated learning.  The assumption in this study was that it is through the process of identity construction that engagement is sustained and supported through the process of group affiliation and is distributed through apprenticeship, modeling, and group interaction.

Social Learning Theory Scale/Application Author(s)
Engagement Aggregate Chapman, 2006
Communities of Practice Structural Social Wenger, 1996
Positive Interdependence Structural Social Deutsch, 1962, Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Johnson and Holubec, 1998),
Affinity Groups Structural Social Gee, 2001
Self-Determination Social Psychological Deci and Ryan, 2008

 

Identity construction may be an organizing principle in understanding motivation and engagement, and yet these social learning theories do not present themselves as descriptions of the identity construction process, but rather focus on structural factors in relationships Community (Wenger, 1998), (Deutsch, 1962, Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Johnson, Johnson and Holubec, 1998), Activity (Gee, 2001), and needs of the individual (Deci and Ryan, 2008) as organizing principles. For the purposes of this study, these theories were operationalized to provide insight for designing instructional environments that will motivate and sustain the engagement of the learner. It was predicted that identity construction would predict motivation and engagement. This prediction was based upon the recurrence of the theme throughout the social learning theories. The act of identity construction is an act of becoming, Not only do individuals construct a unique description of themselves as an identity, but it I also conferred upon them and reinforced through context, including age, personal history, relationships and history, location, and community status.

Identity construction rituals and rites of passage

Traditionally, communities gather to provide ceremony for initiation and status transition for such things as the celebration of status change from child to adult; initiation single people to married couple; and a multitude of culturally mediated roles, acknowledgement, and transitions. Although there may be many more transitions and ritual’s in today’s society because of the great variety of cultural subgroups, i.e. churches, car clubs, self-help groups like Alcoholic Anonymous, and hobby groups like The Peoples’ Revolutionary Knitting Circle, etc.; many of these groups traditionally necessitated face to face interaction, but with the internet and today’s computing power, these relations can be mediated digitally through portals such as Facebook, Xbox Live, Second Life, and other social networking tools.

The Dance Dance Revolution game club might be represented as a ritual rite of passage to understand how and why people build identities around their play, and sustain engagement to ultimately develop expertise.  Central to the rite of passage is the initiation ritual (Van Gennep, 1960), where new roles and status are conferred through public performance where play, the subjunctive mood (Turner, 1969), situates the activity, so that rules, roles, and consequences are suspended and participants can explore new identities, associated activities, and their semiotic domains and develop new status.

With this in mind, video games may represent new forms of the rite of passage and initiation ritual; games are structured activities that are valued by certain cultural sub-groups, represent expert systems that resemble apprenticeship activities, involve performance initiation, and with similar emphasis on what Sutton-Smith (1976) called the play ethos. The ethos is the context and purpose of the activity. It is as the expectation of consequence of an activity performed. It is the context where play is the subjunctive mood. The subjunctive mood observed in games and ritual are said to decontextualize the action and provide a suspension of rules, roles, and consequences found in ordinary life to allow for the exploration of new identities, rules, roles, actions, and social affiliations and status in a safe space.

Purpose of study

This interview was to inform design features to develop a program for pre-adolescent exercise with Dance Dance Revolution for the study of obesity reduction and increasing bone density. The study was also intended to get a sense of why a young woman sustained engagement with Dance Dance Revolution over three years to develop expertise, and how educators might replicate that kind of commitment to learning and practice.

Background of the study

Health care professionals have observed an increase in levels of childhood obesity. This increase has been attributed in large part to physical inactivity. Physical inactivity not only leads to obesity and poor cardiovascular health, it also has negative effects on bone health. Bones function to support a mechanical load (a force exerted by body weight, muscle, growth, or activity). Bone is constantly formed and reabsorbed throughout life in a generally balanced way. However, in a three- to four-year window during puberty, bone formation is accelerated. In that period, as much bone material is deposited as will be lost during a person’s entire adult life. During these pivotal years of bone development, physical activity is important for optimizing bone health, as it has been shown to reduce the incidence of fractures later in life.

Because it is difficult to motivate children to participate in the type of cardiovascular activities that adults engage in (running, cycling, aerobics), new strategies must be developed, and these may demand elements that             motivate the learner to sustain engagement over a longer period of time in order to promote and sustain life habits for physical conditioning.

Dance Dance Revolution is not your typical video game.


Dance Dance Revolution is a game that you set up with mats, a TV, a game console and a game disk and up to four people can play simultaneously (figure 1).  To play DDR, a participant responds to a series of directional arrows, (see figure 2) displayed on a video or TV screen to perform choreographed dance steps or hops synchronized to music. Song tempo and degree of difficulty increase as the player successfully progresses in the game. Because of the game’s popularity and its cardiovascular exercise and jumping (bone-building) components, it could represent an appealing model for reducing physical inactivity in children.

The video dance game Dance Dance Revolution may be a possible solution to increasing activity and mechanical load because of the amount of jumping activity, but the young person must be motivated to start, and engagement must be sustained for the activity to produce valid and reliable measures of obesity and bone density.

The issue under investigation is how to help young people start an activity and sustain it; the

simple answer to this was, seemingly, to make it fun; to make it a high-interest activity; but many toys, games, and activities are often tried once and then put aside. What came out of the interview was:

  • the importance of aligning the outcomes with a desirable activity,
  • the importance of group and environment to the construction of status and identity that makes belonging to a group desirable;
  • allow for status and relation for reinforcement;
  • the centrality of ritual and rites of passage in group performance,
  • autonomy supporting environments,
  • and again the importance of identity construction for transformation to instantiate sustained engagement conveyed through affiliation, apprenticeship, and expertise.

Interviewee/ informant

To explore this, we recruited Ellen as a DDR expert and possible employee to lead an after school program at one of our sites at the Minneapolis Public Schools. We had posted a hiring description for DDR experts and we had a number of responses; one respondent, Charles, shared that he had a lot of friends who were really good at DDR, and Ellen was listed as one of those people.  Ellen came into the lab to show us her DDR play, and we were impressed with her expertise.

What was interesting about Ellen was that she was not from a subversive or reactionary sub-culture. Ellen is part of one of the least studied cultural sub-group in schools (Buckingham, 2007)—an urban, middle class teen that is successful in school, is respectful to teachers, has a part-time job, plays varsity soccer, traveling band, is part of the International Baccalaureate Program, and has a satisfying home life.

These elements of her identity were surprising. We usually assume that video game players are a disenfranchised fringe group at school who do not engage with the typical academic fare. But Ellen was able to balance not only her academics and music instruction, work a part-time job, but also play sports and have friendships. These elements of balance were enticing and we wanted to know how she was doing it so that we might try and replicate not only the physical health benefits in our bone density study, but also some of the psycho-social and affective elements necessary for sustaining engagement (Chapman 2006) —she seemed like a great role model for creating a curriculum that would rely heavily on identity development and she was an intriguing informant to help us understand how play identities might lead to work habits to form healthy minds and bodies.

Methodology and review of literature

The question driving this investigation is “why did she sustain engagement in learning?”

According to Chapman (2006), engagement is more than behavioral time on task. When looking to measure growth or change, or even to understand whether a learner has truly engaged, an educator should also look for evidence of commitment and positive attitudes related to the activity and subject matter.

  • Engagement is not just doing the work, it is a connection and an affinity to an activity supported from the affective domains (Chapman, 2003).
  • Skinner & Belmont (1993, p.572) report that engaged learners show sustained behavioral involvement in learning activities accompanied by a positive emotional tone and select tasks at the border of their competencies, initiate action when given the opportunity, and exert intense effort and concentration.
  • Pintrich and & De Groot (1990, in Chapman) see engagement as having observable cognitive components that can be seen or elicited through exploring the learner’s use of strategy, metacognition, and self-regulatory behavior to monitor and guide the learning processes.

 

These attributes do not magically appear in an activity because a student is told that it is good for them, and that they should commit to their betterment; Least likely is that they do it because we threaten, or because just because we want them to. A student must make a choice to commit to an activity and have that commitment reaffirmed over time to sustain engagement. True engagement in an activity is in some sense transformative and resembles identity construction, in that it changes who we are through cognitive, affective, and behavioral elements; but it seems likely that without positive reinforcement (Skinner, 1938) the behavior may result in extinction and the game becomes another resident on the island of misfit toys.

Dance Dance Revolution is considered a high interest activity for many young people, and it does have a reward system that gives real time feedback on performance with rewards for successful play; but without aligning those rewards and achievement with social capital, they lack meaning and status, and the reinforcement system remains a token economy (Ferster and Skinner, 1957) whose tokens are unredeemable.  Since these flashing lights and high scores do not buy cars, cell phones and other tokens of esteem for young teens, it seems reasonable that gaining status and respect in a desirable community may provide the value that accompanies success and sustains engagement.

The work of Buckingham on identity development may provide some insight for connecting identity with purpose, motivation, and sustained engagement. Buckingham (2008, p. 3) states that:

Identity is developed by the individual, but it has to be recognized and

confirmed by others. Adolescence is also a period in which young people

negotiate their separation from their family, and develop independent

social competence (for example through participation in “cliques”  and

larger “crowds” of peers, who exert different kinds of influence).

Identity and status were traditionally conferred through rites of passage, and there may have been many culturally specific instances of these rites for different groups and related activities. Video games may represent a new wrinkle in the way that we enact and view rites of passage–games may offer a form of guided,  ritualized behavior for identity construction and group affiliation as an autonomy supporting environment (Ryan & Deci, 1999), Affinity Group (Gee, 2001), or Community of Practice (Wenger, 1998).

A rite of passage does not need to resemble the tribal practices that led to vision quests, ritual markings, or exodus. A rite of passage may be organized in three forms: the process of separation, transition, and integration, (Van Gennep, 1960), but all three of these rites may also be presented as single rite (Barnard and Spencer, 1996). What is important for Van Gennep is the idea of Liminality, or the threshold. In the context of Liminality, the activity space may be far removed from reality, and roles, rules, tools, values, and status may be situated in the flux of play as if a hybrid or interstitial space (Turner, 1969).  This concept of the threshold and liminality seems to validate Geertz (1972) and his description of the “Center Bet” in describing the ritual of Balinese Cockfighting and Benthams’ concept of Deep Play.  According to Turner (1969), there may be many rites of passage in a person’s life through sub-cultural affiliation (Cock Fighting, DDR, First Job) where identity and entitlement are inculcated through desire to become a respected an acknowledged group member, where they can share in and contribute to group activity, participate in group spaces, and publicly perform renewing and furthering status.

Since identity is conferred from others, there are factors that can identify a person as a group member and as having identity markings. For Gee (2001), the activity is primary and provides the motivation, the source of group membership and markings; and this membership comes about from engagement in active communal practice that centers on the activity; the ancillary relationships stem from the interaction related to the activity.  He states that these communities and spaces are hard to identify without knowing the person’s intentions — exactly why people are there.  Whether a person actually claims group membership or is acknowledged can be difficult. For Gee, group membership may not be acknowledged or claimed, but attributes can still be observed. The role of Gee’s work is central to operationalizing identity and group membership through offering observable sociocultural markers that come from the semiotic domains as evidence of group membership.

A semiotic domain recruits one or more modalities (e.g., oral or written language,

images, equations, symbols, sounds, gestures, graphs, artifacts, and so forth) to

communicate distinctive types of messages.  By the word “fluent” I mean that the

learner achieves some degree of mastery, not just rote knowledge. . . Semiotic

domains are, of course, human creations.  As such, each and every one of them is

associated with a group of people who have differentially mastered the domain, but

who share norms, values, and knowledge about what constitutes degrees of mastery

in the domain and what sorts of people are, more or less, “insiders” or “outsiders”.

Such a group of people share a set of practices, a set of common goals or endeavors,

and a set of values and norms, however much each of the individuals in the group may

also have their own individual styles and goals, as well as other affiliations.

Gee (2001, pg. 2).

This work allows for certain attributes of group membership to be observable rather than subjective. A young person may have grown up participating in an activity with parents and young friends, but during the puberty years, may reject that affiliation based upon new goals for group membership. A new group may be more desirable than a current group, and the young person may cast of markings that identify them with the old group such as a hat from a uniform, ways of speaking, values, etc. This does not mean that markings of prior group membership with parents, family, and childhood affiliations are not still observable. For Gee it is the activities and the group practices that provide evidence of social learning and group membership from semiotic domains, and it is activity that is central to identity construction.

For Wenger, (1998) identity is central to human learning; identity construction and learning are distributed through community and relations; learning is socially constructed; and motivation is based on a desire for sharing and participatory culture. The work of Wenger shares many attributes with Gee’s work, but the focus for Wenger was on socially distributed cognition and learning as social participation. Earlier work explored the role of learning in apprenticeship, where newcomers would enter into a space where learning was situated and contextualized, and goals and purpose were evident due to entering the space. One entered the space to gain apprenticeship and attempt to acquire and learn the sociocultural practices of the community. Thus the individual is drawn to the group and begins to engage and learn by finding their role in a distributed, networked, cultural-cognitive process with the purpose of the individual as an active participant in the practices of a social community. This participation leads to the construction of his/her identity through these communities. From this understanding develops the concept of the community of practice: a group of individuals participating in communal activity– creating their shared identity through engaging in and contributing to the practices of their communities.

The difficulty with this theory is that group membership is hard to define. A person may want to be part of group and claim group membership, but not have the identifiable characteristics that define the membership, but it did lay the groundwork for many of the same features of Gee’s construct.

For Deci and Ryan (2008) these same attributes are also shared, but the focus of Self-Determination Theory comes from work on motivation with a focus on Autonomy — possibly built from early work by White (1959) where organisms have an innate need to experience competence, and experience joy and pleasure with the new behaviors when they assert competence over the environment.—what he called effectance motivation.

For Ryan and Deci motivation is based on the degree that an activity or value has been internalized, and this is based upon the degree to which the behavior has meaning within the context of the arena of performance. In this sense, the feelings of relatedness and belonging in a social, or group setting, play a part in the internalization process along with an inherent desire for competence and autonomy. In order to feel belonging and relatedness, an individual develops autonomy through competence and creates the identity for relatedness and belonging. This process can happen from belonging to competence to autonomy, or other sequences. The key motivating factor for Deci and Ryan is autonomy.

In order to sustain engagement for Deci and Ryan, motivation must be internalized . . . the external contingency must be “swallowed whole”. By swallowed whole, the learner identifies the value of the new behavior with other values that are part of the self. This process of engagement is the transformation of an extrinsic motive, one that is reinforced from outside the learners’ values, into an activity that is assimilated and internalized by the learner as an intrinsic value that is part of their personal identity. This process involves constructing values aligned with the group and environment, and thus assimilates behavioral norms that were originally external as part of a new identity. Based on the degree of control exerted by external factors, levels of extrinsic motivation can be aligned along a continuum (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

 

 

  • External regulation: doing something for the sake of achieving a reward or avoiding a punishment.
  • Introjected regulation: partial internalization of extrinsic motives.
  • Identified regulation: doing an activity because the individual identifies with the values and accepts it as his own.

Identified regulation is autonomous and not merely controlled by external factors. It is motivation for an activity that has been integrated as part of the learner’s values, and refers to identification with thvalues and meanings of the activity to the extent that it becomes fully internalized and autonomous (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Themes for coding

Play 

Subjunctive Mood

Activity Space Desirable social grouping
Ritual Rites of Passage Belonging/ Relatedness
Desirable Activity Identified regulation Apprenticeship
Affective commitment Autonomy/ Competence Cognitive theories of action

 



 

Eleven themes from these theories of identity construction, ritual/ rites of passage, engagement, motivation, and social learning were taken in order to code the interview transcript to inform analysis and make decisions on what factors might be important for the construction our afterschool program so that we can track design efficacy and measure performance.

Data collection

The phenomenological interview methodology (van Manon, 200*) was used to try and elicit responses beyond descriptions of rationale to gather “thick descriptions” (Geertz, 1973) of affective, social, corporeal, and cognitive behaviors (which the researcher hoped for but did not expect) behind the activity and experience of playing Dance Dance Revolution (DDR), but also to encourage descriptions that were thick enough that the researcher might be able to identify instances of engagement situated and distributed learning across networks of time and space, mediated through shared activity,  and perhaps to see if there were evidence indicating whether identity construction and choice did inform motivation and engagement.

Data Analysis

The critical discourse methods as espoused by Gee (1999) and Fairclough (2003) not only provide methodologies that are fundamental to qualitative analysis, but are also fundamental to the study of “the scaffolding of human affiliation within cultures and social groups and institutions,” Gee (1999, pg 1) and “how do existing societies provide people with the possibilities and resources for rich and fulfilling lives,” Fairclough (2003, pg 202). It was for this reason that these methods were used to explore and code the phenomenological interview transcript. Although a sample of one participant is not very robust for generalization, it provided a starting point for more focused theory testing, as well as to provide insights for ourselves as designers, and education practitioners.

Interview

This first excerpt from the interview begins to describe the motivation to learn to play Dance Dance Revolution. Ellen and I met on a nice spring day in the Whittier neighborhood near the Minneapolis Institute of Arts at a coffee shop called Spy House.  When I had asked her what was the experience of playing DDR, she said:

The first time I ever played Dance Dance Revolution was with my

friends Tyler and Ben. They had it at Devon’s house and everyone

was playing this game. Really, I wanted to hang out with them, I

wanted to participate and so that’s when I started learning. Then it

was after playing with those guys for so long that I really started to

enjoy the game. I actually didn’t have a play station before that, so

I went out and bought a play station just so I could play DDR, yeah. . .

yeah, I didn’t want to be left out of it. Games are fun and I just wanted

to spend time with my friends and this is something that they were

all doing.

The basis for Ellen’s learning was to Belong to a Desirable Group. This idea of relatedness and Belonging were fundamental in her development of skills and collection of resources to develop as a player. However, she did not have the feeling of connectedness until she was really able to engage in the activity as a participating member —Autonomy/Competence. Also of interest was that the activity was not initially a Desirable Activity, “I wanted to participate and so that’s when I started learning”. After some time participating, she found enjoyment along with her sense of Belonging to a Desirable Group. This phenomenon suggests precedence of Belonging to a Desirable Group over Desirable Activity, and also suggests that an individual can develop interest in activity that might not have been initially motivating. Speculatively, there may be some indication for the importance of play as a subjunctive for developing affinity for an activity. It was clear that she had already identified with the people, but, based on the next excerpt, she had not identified or been identified with the activity.

I was excited because this was something I could participate in. I’ve played Halo and I’m not that good at it and everyone was starting out on this for the first time, so I thought I could be one of those good people at it and get respect from people. I was really excited. They have this huge TV at Devon’s house and everyone’s around you. I was kind of nervous too because you have to do this in front of people. Well, we were all kind of sitting on the couch watching the men and I was like I want to try it. I mean, some of them were interested in seeing me probably because they knew I never played before and they made me where I was probably going to fail, but then I actually really wanted to do it, so I was like I want to do it next! I thought I was going to be better at the game than I thought I was because I’m thinking oh these guys they don’t have any coordination. This’ll be easy for me. I’m kind of in shape, so I was thinking it would be pretty easy and then I do some of these songs and I was like oh, I need to go down a level! I thought I caught on fairly quickly.

What was clear from this passage was the importance of the activity and her feeling that she could be successful participating and “be one of those good people at it and get respect from people.” There are several parts to this that are especially interesting:

  1. Belief in her ability to succeed was essential in her willingness to perform publicly. Research on adolescents’ engagement in literacy for example has found that adolescent perceptions of their competence and ability to succeed may be a more important predictor of whether they will engage than their past performance. (Alvermann, 2001; Anderman et al., 2001; Bean, 2000; Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000). Studies of adolescents have also found that they prefer to perform where they know they will have success (Csikzhentmihaly, 200*).
  2. The fear of performing in front of the group with Autonomy/ Competence but that since people were just starting out, she might have a chance to be good at it and to be respected. Thismay have played an even larger role because she was one of the girls who watch, not one of “the men” who play the games and perform.
  3. The importance of the Activity Space and its affordances as well as the possible change in atmosphere with this new game, where there may have been more emphasis on Play as the Subjunctive Mood.

This makes a case for the importance of Affective Commitment, Competence as well as a Cognitive Theory of Action. Although these seem to be sublevels of Desirable Activity and Belong to a Desirable Group, that inform and reinforce action. She had created a Cognitive Theory of Action and knew that it was essential for her to perform to be acknowledged and claim membership — another indication of Chapman’s (2006) description of engagement and evidence of Identifiable Regulation. To claim Belonging to this Desirable Social Group, she realized whether implicitly or not, that she needed to participate through performance (Autonomy/Competence) to Belong. This supports Deci and Ryan’s position that Autonomy, Belonging, and Competence are basic needs that underlie motivation and engagement and satisfy Skinner and Belmont’s assertion of affective involvement.

In addition, Ellen had already aligned her values internally as Identifiable Regulation— but she had not found an opportunity with a Desirable Activity where she might have success in the Activity Space where she could feel confident that she would succeed and enjoy the activity,

I could be one of those good people at it and get respect from people”

Halo and Counterstrike she described as work (Sutton-Smith, 1996), which has consequences for failure — the desirable group may have been much more advanced in their performance in Halo and Counterstrike, and perhaps took playing the game much more seriously and raised the stakes of the performance.

Games and play are often about choices without life-threatening consequences, but that does not mean that games are not taken seriously. They can be performance tests (Autonomy/ Competence) and Ritual/Rites of Passage that allow for the development and affirmation of a place within a group, establishment of pecking orders, and through this, community status and entitlement . . . and it is possible that the experience of being positioned to perform and possibly fail was some sort of initiation, a form of deep play (Bentham in Geertz, 1975).

This act of bettering oneself in public is a tricky situation—but it really must occur in public for a person to be seen as Competent/Autonomous and an acknowledged group member (Belonging). This Ritualistic phenomenon was described by Geertz as the “Center Bet” in “Deep Play”, (1975) and based upon Ellen’s description, it may be that as play in an activity advances, the play gets more serious and the stakes and status of the Ritual change, and the work ethos takes precedence over Play as Subjunctive Mood.

In the DDR trial, Ellen was tested to see how she would respond to public failure: she could have quit and gone home, or she could laugh it off and find the fun in learning and work towards acceptance. As will be shown in the next excerpt, Ellen found that there were others who were beginners that she could get better with, and more experienced players were actually helpful and willing (Apprenticeship) to teach — she also found that there is no substitute for experience, and that in order to become a part of the group, she had to go through the rites of practice and public initiation–according to Van Gennep (1960) this ritualized process is common to many societies where an individual passes from one stage of life to another, and it  can involve separation from childhood environment, transition, and incorporation with new status.  For Turner (1969), this game may not be as monumental as rites celebrating marriage or death, but still represents a moment of social transition and eventual change in status. The importance of this is the public acknowledgement of Competence, and this seems to be essential to identity construction and acceptance as a member of a group (Buckingham, 2007).

The performance/ initiation

Previously, Ellen may have wanted to be part of the group, but Ellen stated that the games they were playing did not provide her with much interest to play, even though she wanted to belong with the group and participate in their space. Because of this, she may not have been considered as part of the group, but maybe more of a tourist or poser; because belonging seemed contingent on being able to “do”.

I have a lot of friends who play Counterstrike and a lot of . . . almost every guy I know plays Halo. You can enjoy watching those games. I don’t enjoy it as much. Like I said, it’s just way more serious. They get more serious. Well, it’s like everyone is more quiet and focused, like they really get into trying to hunt these people down and kill them before they are hunted down and killed. DDR, you are playing against someone but then with Halo and Counterstrike you’re against all these people and you have to be like watching your back all the time. Even the people watching, they zone out and just watch it. For me it’s not as fun. As for DDR, it’s more like people jumping around and are less serious but it’s still a lot of fun.

Prior to Ellen’s embrace of the game, she was a groupie. She could talk about how Devon did, but not about her own experience. This came in part as being recognized as a player by her community, but it was also a confidence that came of public performance (Autonomy/ Competence) and embrace of public performance; sustaining engagement with the practice; working hard to develop status and identity related to the group and the activity and the freedoms and responsibilities that accompany them.

So what followed was me just trying to find where I could go to play. Then I kind

of got eventually frustrated with it—well, not frustrated but I wanted to play more,

so I decided to buy it for myself.

Yeah.

You play by yourself to get better to play with other people. I mean, it’s always fun to play by yourself and unlock new songs and things like that.

I got it for Christmas from my parents, so I didn’t have to buy it but I had to persuade them and make sure they got me what I wanted. They didn’t really understand but they felt okay about it because it wasn’t something violent or anything like that.

Then I was like look what I can do! They watched me. They thought it was kind of interesting. This was with my family on Christmas. Then my uncles and my little cousin who was maybe like seven, they all got really interested by it. So my fifty-year-old uncles are trying it and they’re getting really excited. My little cousin, she’s getting excited too. She doesn’t even really understand what’s happening on the screen but she’s like jumping around on the pad.

 

The need for Activity Spaces should not be underestimated, but it seemed clear that Ellen was ready and willing to share her activity in a space, her parents’ holiday party to get the game system, mats, and software.

Ellen’s playing the game with family coincides with the Ritual of Integration/Aggregation as described by Van Gennep (1960), where Ellen has returned to her family with a new status. This status may not rival her accomplishments in sports, band or academics in her family’s values, but in many ways it was a revealing of how she had become different – how she had created difference and separated and returned, and her family’s embrace of this new part of her identity — “gamer girl”.

Dance Dance Revolution, and other games played in Devon’s basement provided an experience that offered the separation and initiation for obtaining group identity through the ritual of public performance that could be recognized not only by the group, but also by others away from the basement and through this the identity and status are further reinforced through the rite of integration. It was through the activity that Ellen was conferred status and identity as member not only by her new friends, but through her family and the community that had the power to convey her status and acceptance. This conferred new identity and acceptance allowed her to become that gamer beyond her normal relations and to extend her community network and be recognized by others to develop new relations and status:

because we shared this thing, so it would be like oh so who’s house are we going to go to tonight to play DDR? Okay. Well, my friend Devon, his house was the main DDR house just because he had a great room for it and everything and his parents didn’t really care how much noise we made or how late we stayed there, so his house is generally the DDR house. Tyler, who was my friend prior, we would get together                   and practice a lot. Michael, he bought DDR around the time that I did and we were basically kind of on the same level and I got to know him better that way just by spending time with all these people. Nick, all these other guys, I had kind of known beforehand but now we spent all this time together. So it was basically we all met at Devon’s house and that’s what we would do for weekend after weekend after                     weekend.

If we can draw from these Activity Spaces and domains and inspire the learner to feel a connection and affinity to traditional academic fare like engineering, literature, mathematics, etc. What is also evident that we can create Desirable Activities that align with academic learning where the learning outcomes are embedded in the activity, that supports committed participation and engagement.

What makes Devon’s house a desirable Activity Space was probably the Autonomy they were given in the basement. Devon’s parents gave them access to a big television, let them come and go, let them choose their hours, and allowed them to express themselves with their music played loud in activities of their choice. This was probably trust earned versus parental apathy judging from Ellen and her friends, but this kind of Autonomy cannot be underestimated. What seems to make an Activity Space desirable is the ability to have Autonomy/ Competence, and perhaps this is one of the factors that make for a Desirable Group and the desire for Belonging/Relatedness as well as in creating a Desirable Activity.

Although there seemed to be many homes the kids could have had their gatherings, none of them seemed very prominent in her description, and the only mention Ellen made in the interview of Activity Spaces other than Devon’s were her parents’ house on holiday, when she was showing new friends how to play that were not part of her DDR group at Devon’s; when she would practice to ready herself for Devon’s; and the hotel room on her band trip to New York City.

As Ellen’s ability with the game progressed, she was being recognized as DDR “gamer girl”, and this conferred a new identity and status. She began to find new connections throughout her school experience, as more people knew about her new status as a “gamer girl” beyond her former status as an International Baccalaureate student (Academic), varsity soccer player (Jock/Athlete), Band Member (Musician). It may have been important for Ellen to branch out and change people’s perceptions In the same way that she described the Desirable Group:

Really, I wanted to hang out with them . . . games are fun.”

and the proposition that  might follow as if a syllogism, is that:

gamers are fun, and I want to be fun too.

Perhaps all that work in Academics, Sports, and Band had made her appear too serious, and maybe she felt constrained by all of her commitments and wanted to break out to meet new, fun people? It is only conjecture and anecdotal, and she did not abandon her commitment to band, sports, or academics — she did graduate with an IB diploma — but as can be imagined, all that work in those areas may have made it important to find friends who had interests beyond her everyday world, and that being with them would allow her to step away from conversations about the team, assignments, practicing to perform, and set her apart.

Developing these relations more than fun, but a coping tool. The importance of play, according to Vygotsky (1972), is decontextualization, where an individual can gain gratification and pleasure even in the midst of unresolved issues and larger, time consuming projects. The role of pretense and imagination can bring about pleasure and in the face of uncontrollable circumstances; this can provide some relief. Perhaps the gaming provided an opportunity to decompress and laugh in the midst of all that responsibility and preparation. An example of this may be seen in Ellen’s bringing the game on a band trip.

Yeah, it was a school band trip. So a lot of us went and it turned out that a whole bunch of people knew what DDR was. It was interesting to see them play. Tyler and I, we kind of felt cool because our group that we had played with had progressed better than these other people that we were seeing play. They were like oh man this kid is so good and we play with him all the time. Tyler and I played against these                 people— Yeah, we beat them pretty bad.

In this instance, the game activity did extend beyond the familiar Activity Spaces like Devon’s basement; it even seemed to provide an activity that she could share with new groups as a Desirable Activity that would make others see her as part of a Desirable Group that others would seek Belonging/ Relatedness. The game seems to have supplanted the importance of being part of the gamer group in Devon’s basement, and the activity became a means for extending her friend network as Gee (2001) as an Affinity Group, where people affiliate because of an affinity for an activity. The next section demonstrates this. As the activity began to change for the group members, relationships started to change, and the emphasis on the game diminished.

Well, a lot of the guys that I started playing it with, they moved on to other games because that’s what they do. They focus in on something for a really long time and then they’ll find something else will be just released and everybody else will just be playing that, so they’ll jump into that. Then there was always the people who have it, like Tyler and I, who will still play it. We didn’t get bored with it; it’s just then there       were other things. No. I don’t play it as much as I do anymore and my friendships through that have become different. I mean, we’re all still friends. DDR was just like this common thing that we had to like start us talking and then after that we talked about normal things. I became pretty good friends with a lot of people. I dated one of  the guys that I met for awhile. I don’t know, it wasn’t like any different than like you           meet people playing for a sports team. You have something in common and that’s what you’re coming together to do, and then you talk about other stuff because we’re not just focused on DDR. Well, at my work it’s kind of similar too. We’re all stuck working together and so then we get talking. Soccer and sports a lot. Any kind of group that you all come together and you have something to talk about and then we  just eventually expand on that and that’s how we became friends.

The DDR game did facilitate the relationship in ways that other games and activities did not, but in the end, the initial motivation may need to come from purpose only the individual can formulate. But play can facilitate this and may make the entrance to a group, the practice, and eventual mastery of knowledge, activity space, and activity more likely to be enticing and possibly provide for sustained engagement and eventual mastery. This makes a case for Play as a Subjunctive Mood.

Playgroups, and the activities that support them, provide a common ground for interaction. There is definitely a pecking order that comes from demonstrable competence and evidence of knowledge from the semiotic domains from the game. Games are built upon play, pretense, and decontextualization, but once these activities no longer provide pleasure and gratification, the activity may quickly end and the relationships and spaces that contextualize and support them may change in the way that Ellen’s DDR group cooled off: “and my friendships though have become different. I mean, we’re all still friends.

Games are structured forms of play, Dubbels (2008) that provide rules and roles that are defined to help members to decontextualize from the ordinary world where they have responsibility, deadlines, and environments they cannot control. These same rules and roles also help them know their status in the game, share common, spontaneous, and authentic experience without going too deep into personal motives, negative feelings, and Freudian meltdowns. Corsaro (1985) called this play group phenomenon the Actors Dilemma, and according to Corsaro, the Freudian meltdown, or oversharing, is one of the most common causes of playgroup breakup—perhaps play is the coping mechanism that allows for detachment and the ability to constructively work on what can be changed and separating from that which cannot be. Game roles may also allows for exploration of other peoples’ values and experience in a safe space without getting too deep or real, which represents an opportunity to try on and project different emotions, and build comfort and trust through common experience.

In terms of Ritual/ Rites of Passage, a game  would be a means for rite of passage, where the Activity Space is no longer like the ordinary world, and rules and roles are different and even changed for the sake of experimentation and normal social and interpersonal boundaries can be tested without endangering status and relationships. With Play as the Subjunctive Mood, different parts of person can emerge and people can try on different personae without recrimination — because they are only playing.

 

Conclusion

In answering the original question, “why did she sustain engagement?” it became evident that her motivation to sustain engagement over time changed. She was attracted to the activity because she wanted to be friends with the kids who hung out at Devon’s basement — she wanted to be an acknowledged member of the group, not part of the fan club. To do this she had to perform and risk ridicule and a possible reduction in status. Geertz (1976) described this spatially in that the further away you were from the Center Bet, where the desirable activity takes place, the lower your status and importance to the main event and performers.

In order to be part of this group, she needed to perform, but she might was hesitant to try because of the games they were playing did not mesh with her sense of play and fun—perhaps because the play of these group members with these games (Halo, Counterstrike) was already too far advanced for them to tolerate a “newb” (new player) at the controller; and it might be better not impose oneself and risk ridicule or contempt if one is not contributing to the play, learning, and or status of the group.

The role of Play as a Subjunctive Mood in these Activity Spaces and Desirable Groups may be the organizing principle that makes these groups and activities desirable as part of identity construction, as well as the means for identity construction. The subjunctive mood situates and mediates the discourse around the group desirability, the space and possibilities for interaction, and the perceived activity and likelihood for success and may be the basis for initial motivation to engage and represent the one constant throughout Ellen’s experience with the game, group, and space. For a person to facilitate and construct an identity, they may need to play, just as children play doctors, firefighters, teachers, mothers, and even animals in games. It is through pretense that we are able to imagine and create cognitive theories of action and circumstance and it is through play that we develop this capacity. If we want to sustain engagement, we need to help students develop the capacity for Identified Regulation, where they may turn their play into meaningful performance when asked to perform in activities that begin to resemble rites of initiation and deep play. This process creates a subtle transition where the initial play activity becomes serious and is approached with the focus of work, like what Ellen experienced watching advanced players of Halo and Counterstrike, and eventually what she experienced in practicing between school, homework, and lessons to prepare for DDR at Devon’s.

What was desirable about this Desirable Group? Probably their reputations as gamers and their ability to talk as insiders about what they were doing in an Activity Space where they were given Autonomy and Competence; it may have been their ability to create spontaneous neutral experiences that they could talk about in the grind of school-band-sports-work, and how they could look forward to this Ritual space away from the ordinary, where Play was the Subjunctive Mood and replicate this feeling in difficult circumstances to separate from stress and worry.

This ability to detach and decontextualize can be a very valuable trait when dealing with pressures of studying for exams, working, and other responsibilities that cannot offer immediate gratification.  This inability to decontextualize and detach is one of the central behaviors inherent in Play Deprivation (Brown, 1999). The original diagnosis in the 1960’s in describing the incredible violence of Charles Whitmore and his shooting spree from the bell tower at Texas A& M University. It was found that Whitmore was raised in very rigid environment where he was not allowed friends or play. He experienced a life that looked very successful on the surface. But in 1966 he committed what was the largest mass matter in the history of the USA. According to the National Institute for Play website (last visited 4/9/09, http://nifplay.org/whitman.html), Brown, who was a psychiatrist at Baylor College of Medicine at the time, collected behavioral data for a team of expert researchers appointed by the Texas governor to understand what led to Whitmore’s mass murder. What was found through interview, diary, and reconstructing Whitmore

had been under extreme, unrelenting, stress.  After many unsuccessful

efforts to resolve the stress, he ultimately succumbed to a sense of

powerlessness;  he felt no option was left other than the homicidal-suicidal

. . . Whitman had been raised in a tyrannical, abusive household.  From

birth through age 18, Whitman’s natural playfulness had been systematically

and dramatically suppressed by an overbearing father. A lifelong lack of play

deprived him of opportunities to view life with optimism, test alternatives, or

learn the social skills that, as part of spontaneous play, prepare individuals to

cope with life stress. The committee concluded that lack of play was a key

factor in Whitman’s homicidal actions – if he had experienced regular moments

of spontaneous play during his life, they believed he would have developed the skill,

flexibility, and strength to cope with the stressful situations without violence.

Brown continued exploring Play Deprivation as a construct and found similar patterns in other violent offenders, and even traffic deaths related to aggression and chemical issues. The role of play cannot be underestimated for its ability to decontextualize and reframe experience. Play therapy currently is a treatment in child psychology for helping children talk about and understand forces beyond their control.

Play may be vital to our well-being. It has been said that the opposite of play is depression, and depression can lead to feelings of powerlessness — the opposite of what we saw in Ellen’s attempt at Autonomy/ Competence and her efforts to connect. In this way, Play as a Subjunctive Mood may perform an important function in the ability to adapt, perform under stress, and create flexibility and adaptation for dealing with seemingly impossible situations — play may offer way out, a way to cope. But play demands time and space– especially spontaneous play – an activity, as was mentioned, where often we see young people working out issues they have no control over (as in play therapy).

It seems that all three of the social learning theories are context dependent based upon the needs of the individual at the time. Ellen, she was attracted to a Desirable Group as in Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1998) because of the activities and space where this group interacted. And there may have been factors that led to her admiration of these boys . . . it may have come from her admiration of how these kids conducted themselves at school and their reputations that they were fun “gamers”; but it was not until there was a Desirable Activity (Gee, 2001) that she could participate; and participation in a public performance was necessary for her to be acknowledged and feel Belonging/Relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2008). As the group changed their focus on activity, the relationships changed, and new relations were created through the activity; but eventually the activity diminished and new activities and groups presented themselves as desirable.

The utility of this analysis comes from these recalled phenomena as a pattern for planning instruction and understanding why people learn. We learn to become. We create and engage to gain new experience and entitlement and gain status without danger in our social network, as well as to learn from others, whether it is a workplace competency, gaining social skills, or as a means of adapting to stress.

Implications / lessons for designing instructional environments

This transcript from Ellen’s experience makes a case for developing instructional environments that allow for playful, autonomous group interaction structured as a game to allow for play in much the same way that ritual demands play.

This process of making work playful, or working hard at play, is in some ways like finding a vocation or calling . . . in some sense the performance as ritual play, as described by Schechner (1994), is not far off when it comes to identity construction.  Identity is bestowed through communal rites of passage, where individuals are sent away, learn, and perform, and then return to be recognized with a new identity and set of responsibilities.  They are judged and identified based upon their performance. This idea seems especially appropriate for adolescents, who are in the process of identity construction, and are trying to find out who they are through trying out new activities, people, places, attitudes, identities, and things in society that has so many rituals and groups, but none communally organized that focus new identities and vocations.

There is distrust for activities that resemble rituals, games, and play.  Part of this may stem from the independence required of play; the time involved in the rituals and competency development, and our general distrust of play as adult activity. Wohlwend (2007) looked at this notion of work and play through showing teachers video of children in classroom activity centers. Although there were clear examples of what was taken to be off-task behavior (Play), she found that teachers were able to find value in their students play if they were generative in creating connections and transfer to the students’ process and linking it to academic discourse.

The trouble with the perceptions of practitioners and policy makers seems to arise in the misperception between what Sutton-Smith (1997) called the Ethos of Work and Play. Given the opportunity, we may find that Play is a reasonable portal to motivation and sustained engagement through linking to the deeper learning that comes from identity construction and these oddly transformative communities that rise up out of them. In many ways, activities in formal and informal learning environments may not mesh with the intended identity of the learner, and this may indicate the difference between education and socialization along the lines of hegemony. The learner may choose a group affiliation antithetical to the purpose of the classroom.

So how might an educator integrate play, games, and lessons from these social learning theories?

I have used these principles on several occasions to explore games and play as effective methods for aligning content and process with resistant and reluctant learners.

Principle 1 — Play as a Subjunctive Mode

Engineering can be a very fun class, but the curriculum I was supposed to teach was very un-fun. In fact the curriculum was the source of the dysfunction. I was being asked to start class by presenting standards, why the standards were important, and tell the students why they were learning what they were learning. I found that this was much more for the benefit of observers evaluating the quality of my teaching than it was to motivate and engage the students.

I still use standards, and I still feel it is important to share the larger scheme of things behind activities and what they might be preparing for, but I do it with Play as the Subjunctive Mood. The first thing I did was to quit thinking these kids would commit to a curriculum where they were asked to redesign a coffee mug as an activity to learn engineering principles, fulfill standards and a rubric on a power point that came with the packaged curriculum. Fear of failure was not a big deal. Many of them were accustomed to it. They had checked out as an act of integrity and in doing so had found that they could dictate terms to teachers because of their disruptive behavior. Although my departure from redefining coffee mugs and the “do it or fail” curriculum did not sit well with the administrators, it did result in engagement from my students.

I told them that we were going to be having a boat race, and that I would be bringing in my wading pool from home, and that we would be making sail boats out of Styrofoam to race across the pool. I structured all of the engineering principles so that they were embodied in the task, and that through experience, we could discover them. What was essential in this case was not in joining a desirable group, but in participating in a desirable activity where their group could interact in the activity space semi-independently, and that the task was one where they believed that they would have early and instant success.

In addition to this, I also tried an experiment where I used a different approach to creation of subjunctive mood:

Work — I told the kids that we were really behind and that we would have to work hard and be rigorous in our approach to these boats. That it was incumbent upon us to learn terms like resistance, surface area, momentum, and force and apply them into our hull designs.  What came from this my disappearance from their radar. I was talking, but they were ignoring me, tuning me out. When I asked them what they were supposed to do, many of them did not know, and many of them defaulted to resistant behavior.

Play — I told the class that we had a fun activity where we were going to be building boats and that we were going to have four kinds of races: speed, weight bearing, stability, and general purpose. I told them that I was going to be showing them examples of boat hulls and that they should play with them a bit to decide what style of boat they were going to make for the races they were going to participate in. I found that kids had listened, knew what to do, and really wanted to start. All of the same principles and terms were still present in the unit, but they now had permission to be playful and perhaps fail. Play implies failure recovery and experimentation. Many of the kids made crazy boats that would never work, but they were fairly successful in using the terms to justify their design for each race. It is not always what you do, or whom you do it with – it is how you do it.

Principle 2 — Desirable Groups

The role of Desirable Groups was primary for Ellen as a motivator for her becoming a DDR expert, but the tricky part about Desirable Groups was that underneath it was the issue of Play as Subjunctive Mood. A person may be attracted to a group for a number of reasons as we noticed from the three social learning theories.  The grouping provides basic needs as in Self-Determination Theory; it provides apprenticeship and acknowledgement (Lave, 1998); and it may be ancillary, as in the attraction to participate with others in an activity.  A Desirable Group can be a great motivator, but what was found was that eventually the Desirable Activity gets old and people move on and the group affiliation was not all that was necessary for sustaining engagement. This could be because the aspirant group member now understands what is behind Cool Kids Curtain Number One and the mystery of the cool kids is solved; or because the lesson from the apprenticeship has been assimilated. Whatever the motivation, indications were that she did join the group to learn who they were and why they were cool, and that after the fun with the activity wore out, the friendships drifted apart and they moved on to new activities. In addition, that the activity was used to branch out and connect with new groups.

With this in mind, we can situate and structure relations, change communication and status dynamics with Desirable Activities that are well-structured through Activity Spaces that have entitlement and opportunity. In thinking through some of the most well-constructed methods for creating cooperative groups, Cooperative Learning depends heavily on structuring Positive Interdependence (Deutsch, 1962, Johnson & Johnson, 1989) of the sort all three theories seek to describe, as well as construct through what was described from Play Group Literature (Corsaro, 19**) as spontaneous neutral experience, where people could build trust and common purpose.–where to succeed, everyone must succeed.(Johnson and Jonson, 2008, http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl.html#interdependence).

The key element of groups seems to be status and what a person must do to get it. The danger of the Center Bet and the amount of support that comes with affiliation might be the deciding factor – Perceived Ability to Succeed—but it seems more likely that creating an atmosphere with Play as the Subjunctive Mood may be the best predictor of Group Desirability—which seems to come from status, space, activity, likelihood of success and acknowledgement.

Principle three — Spaces

Spaces are where we offer autonomy, equity, entitlement, objects, atmosphere, interaction, and relationships. By creating spaces where learners can self-govern to an extent, we make them desirable, especially if there are desirable tools and resources as affordances. What I did with the boat unit was to create a rite of passage to get from one learning space to another. An initiation where students had to perform to move to the next room — to make that desirable, I put the tools and materials there and gave the students (trustworthy students always get there first because they listen and finish the work early) and allowed them the autonomy to start and work with autonomy and privilege.

The students were told that in order to use the tools and start on their hull designs, that they had to use the hull examples and sketch a hull design In their engineering notebook, and then explain why and how the hull would perform well in specific race conditions (speed, weight-bearing, stability, general purpose) using the key vocabulary postered on the wall. When they were able to describe why and how their hull would perform well, they could go and begin building. This separation from one room to another was where I was able to coach, counsel, and cajole students into thinking more deeply about their designs, make suggestions, and enter their grades. All roads went through me as the Center Bet.

Principal four — Desirable Activities

One of the key issues in creating sustained engagement and identified regulation is in creating activities that align with the goals and purposes of the learner, or exposing the learner to something they think is really cool and they want to do. Making boats was not what many teens would consider a “cool” activity, but it did hold attraction for them when I showed them the tools, the materials, and gave a brief overview of what they would have to do.  Getting kids to engage may just be a matter of creating some fun, and showing that they can have early and instant success; and, that they can make adjustments if they make mistakes. There must be time allowed to go deeply into learning to allow for the student to commit to expression in the work – the work has a part of them in it.

That will allow them to create a cognitive theory of the activity, and also allow for a belief in their future success. Add to this the opportunity to work cooperatively and learn from the work of other class members — some call this copying, I call it modeling and apprenticeship — then they can make a start (often full of errors and mistakes!) and adjust for excellence as they work with others and begin to better understand the project/activity. In this way we enable the spontaneous neutral experience that can be useful for beginning the learning process and also building relationships/ belonging, and autonomy and competence through the activity.

The key to this principle is in embedding the learning in the activity so that learners can discover the learning principles in the process of the activity through performance and reflection, where they compare what they have done with the work of others, and the instructor can provide encouragement to scaffold further development. Oddly, this is how scientific principles often presented in the textbooks were discovered before they were in the textbooks for memorization– they were tripped over by the scientists and then operationalized into methodology that some memorize as students, and others are lucky enough to rediscover in class. This can be done when we think of instruction as games and learning as structured forms of play. Some important elements for designing instruction as play are offered in this taxonomy of play for instructional design:

  • Cognitive Theories of Action: we capture the imagination and build cognitive theories of action through imagery/ visualization (mental modeling).
    • A key word for the instruction should be “IMAGINE”.

This first category in the taxonomy provides a basis for testing comprehension. It is important to be able to create mental model and theory of the action. The key attributes are visualization and imaginatively creating mental models and segmenting process and attributes for indexing in memory. If learners index and visualize well, they will likely have fine grain memory of the experience to draw upon for future use. So creating these mental images is very important for creating the motivation to engage, belief in future success, and a cognitive theory of action.

 

  • Roles: provide roles and identities they can try on and play with, and offer the ability to change roles and play with the identities.
    • A key word for instruction should be “IMITATE”

Working with others:  A great draw because it allows for interaction. Many students need to be able to copy other students until they are able to IMAGINE and create a cognitive theory of action. Some learners do not learn well from instructors. They need to watch another learner translate the experience. Trough this, they not only learn how to start the assignment, but also how to create a cognitive theory of action on which they can improvise and express themselves through and commit to the activity. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen resistant learners get into a groove and not want to stop the project once they finally get started!

  • Roles: In the case of the boat project, they became Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; just learning about what these folks do as a profession, and, that these professions exist opened a lot of high school eyes and creates schema for the semiotic domains of each role. They also had Learning and Functional roles – see Appendix B.
  • Structuring group work: The creation of roles in cooperative learning as Johnson and Johnson suggest (200*) is very powerful and also what we see in early childhood play, as well as more advanced game experience for video games, teaching empathy, and modeling interaction for professional development. In structuring the work through roles, each group member has role specific tasks. Play Return to Castle Wolfenstein or look at game specific roles (character classes) in Appendix A, and imagine how these roles would culminate in teamwork for a mission. Each character class has several unique abilities and these come with different learning roles and functional roles.

 

  • Rules — aka, the Identity Tool Box — Provide rules, values, language, actions, and tools associated with the roles and identities (semiotic domains) that they can work with and act upon that are inherent to the task, where the performance is the assessment. The role of the Naval Architect is to design a marine vessel for specific activities. The elements that define this role are the tools, activities, language, values, and outcomes associated with the role, and ultimately, the boat floats or it doesn’t. This embodiment is informative assessment, where the action provides immediate feedback through complete or partial mastery, or failure and the role provides for measure of progress and schema development based upon knowledge of the semiotic domains.
  • Branching — Create choices and branching decision networks — and it is important here that the learners explain their cognitive theories of action and are asked to utilize and explain the identity tool box to support their choices and why they did what they did, and what might be next.
  • Contingency/ Probability — this comes about when we consider the possible contingencies that might come from an action through prediction and hypothesis testing.  Examples of this are resource management; awareness of likelihood of an action based upon knowledge of the game/ instructional environment, and attempted quantification and probability of failure/ success.

This structure for instructional design is a variation of A Taxonomy for Play from Dubbels (2008) and has been the basis for a number of successful curriculum units as well as digital games and is also available at www.vgalt.com.

A final note ~ Play as Subjunctive Mood

A brief experiment testing this occurred at Games Learning Society in a session called Real Time Research, where groups of participants from the RTR session went into the conference and conducted research on games. The author created a tool for measuring engagement to test whether Play as a Subjunctive Mood, or Work as a Subjunctive Mood would yield the greatest engagement from GLS conference participants. The hypothesis we were seeking to test was whether talk about play would elicit greater engagement on social, affective, and cognitive levels as compared to work.

The hypothesis was that people would engage with their descriptions differently when talking about work and play, and the sock puppet would elicit play behaviors and greater engagement. This would be gauged through analysis of the discourse captured in the video recordings of the interviews and then coded with a framework built from elements of engagement as summarized by Chapman (2003) and codified (see Appendix C).

The interviewees really engaged and took risks with the sock puppets. What is compelling about this experiment was that we were able to elicit more of the person with the sock puppet than we were with simple talk—there was much greater engagement and the participants seemed to enjoy the experience. The changes in treatments through creating different subjunctive mood –play versus work—were really quite dramatic.

What is important about these observations, as well as the finding of the analysis of Ellen’s experience with Dance Dance Revolution seems to be the expectations about interaction and purpose: Play as the Subjunctive Mood seems to represent a portal to engagement and its sustenance.
Appendix A

From the Wikipedia:

Soldier: The soldier is the only class that can use heavy weapons. They are: mortar, portable machine gun (MG42), flamethrower, and bazooka/Panzerfaust. On the No-Quarter mod the Venom machine-gun and the BAR (Allies) or StG44 (Axis) have been added as well. Leveling up gives the Soldier benefits such as the ability to run with heavy weapons (instead of being slowed down).

 

Medic: The medic has the unique ability to drop health packs, as well as revive fallen players with a syringe. They also regenerate health at a constant rate, and have a higher base health than any other class, which makes them the most common class for close-in combat. When a player has achieved skill level 4 in medic, they get Self Adrenaline, which enables them to sprint for, longer and take less damage for a certain amount of time. Some of the medics act as Rambo Medics. Their emphasis is on killing rather than healing or reviving.

Engineer: The engineer is the only class which comes equipped with pliers, which can be used to repair vehicles, to arm/defuse (dynamite or land mines), or to construct (command posts, machine-gun nests, and barriers). As most missions require some amount of construction and/or blowing up of the enemy’s construction to win the objective, and as defusing dynamite can be very useful, engineers are often invaluable, and one of the most commonly chosen classes. The engineer is also the only class capable of using rifle muzzle grenades.

 

Field ops: The field ops is a support class which has the ability to drop ammo packs for other players, as well as call air strikes (by throwing a colored smoke-grenade at the target) and artillery strikes (by looking through the binoculars and choosing where they want the artillery support fired). This class has low initial health, but makes up for having an unlimited supply of ammunition.

 

Covert ops: The covert ops is the only class which can use the scoped FG42 automatic rifle, the silenced Sten submachine gun (or MP-34 on some Mods), and a silenced, scoped rifle (M1 Garand for Allies, K43 Mauser for Axis). The covert ops has the ability to wear a fallen enemy soldier’s clothes to go about disguised, throw smoke-grenades to reduce visibility temporarily, and place and remotely detonate explosive satchels. By looking through a pair of binoculars, the covert ops can spot enemy landmines, bringing them up on their team-map. The covert ops also shows enemy soldiers on the team-map. Medic, Engineer,   This creates a fluid transition to the next category.
Appendix B

Functional Roles – Adopted from http://www.myread.org/organisation.htm (last visited 3/9/09)

ENCOURAGER and COP

  • Reads instructions and directs participation
  • Read the instructions
  • Call for speakers
  • Organize turn-taking
  • Call for votes
  • Count votes
  • State agreed position

 

ENCOURAGER and SPY

  • Summarizes findings and trades

ideas with other groups

  • Check up on other groups
  • Trade ideas with other groups

*Allowed to leave your place when directed by the teacher

 

ENCOURAGER and SCRIBE

  • Writes and reports groups ideas;

is not a gatekeeper.

  • Record all ideas

 

  • Don’t block
  • Seek clarification

ENCOURAGER and STORE KEEPER

Locates, collects and distributes resources including informational resources like web pages and encyclopedia entries

  • Get all the materials for the entire group
  • Collect worksheets from the teacher

 

  • Sharpen pencils
  • Tidy up

*Allowed to leave your place without teacher permission

 


LEARNING ROLE for LITERACY–

 

Freebody (1992) and Freebody and Luke (1990) identify the roles literate people take on.

CODE BREAKER

How do I crack this code?

· What words are interesting, difficult or tricky? How did you work them out?

· What words have unusual spelling?

· What words have the same sound or letter pattern or number of syllables?

· What words have the same base word or prefix or suffix?

· What words mean the same (synonyms)?

· What smaller word can you find in this word to help you work it out?

· What words are tricky to pronounce?

· How is this word used in this context?

· What different reading strategies did you use to decode this text?

· Are the pictures close ups, mid or long shots?

· Are the pictures high angle or low angle?

· Were there any word pictures, eg similes and metaphors? How did you work them out?

USER

What do I do with this text?

· What sort of text is this? (information, story/narrative) How do you know?

· Is it fact or opinion? How do you know?

· How can you find information in this text?

· How did the author start this text? Did it suit its purpose?

· Who would read a text like this? Why?

· If you wrote a text like this what words and phrases would you use?

· How is the language the same/ different from other similar texts you have read?

· Could the text help solve a real life problem?

· If you were going to put this text on a web page, how would it be different to the print version?

· What is the purpose of this text?

Could you use these ideas in a poem, story, play,

advertisement, report, brochure or poster?

· How would the language, structure and change?

 

PARTICIPANT (EXPERT)

What does this text mean to me?

· Does the text remind you of something that has happened to you or to someone else you know?

· What does the title/cover suggest that the text is about?

· What might happen next? What words or phrases give you this idea?

· What are the characters thinking and feeling? How do you know?

· What message is the author presenting?

· What are the main ideas presented?

· What do the pictures (graphs, diagrams, tables, captions, illustrations) tell us?

· Do they fit in with the text and do they provide more information?

· What did you feel as you read this part?

· Describe or draw a picture of a character, event or scene from the text.

 

ANALYST (INVESTIGATOR)

What does this text do to me?

· Is the text fair?

· What would the text be like if the main characters were girls rather than boys and vice versa?

Consider different race and cultural backgrounds too.

· How would the text be different if told from another point of view?

· How would the text be different if told in another time or place, eg 1900 or 2100?

· Why do you think the author chose this title?

· Think about why the author chose particular words and phrases.

· Are there stereotypes in the text?

· Who does the text favor or represent?

· Who does the text reject or silence?

· How does this text claim authority? (consider language, structure and content)

· Who is allowed to speak? Who is quoted?

 


Appendix C — Scoring for Play as Subjunctive Mood

Scoring categories for checklist:

A review of play research from Brown (http://nifplay.org/polar-husky.html, last visited 2/12/09) Informs this chekliostindicates that there are social cues that indicate play will be the subjunctive mood in an interaction.

SYM/ ASSM (Symmetrical/ Asymmetrical):

Symmetry indicates threat, standing ground, seriousness, and a willingness to confront and fight, whereas asymmetry indicates the willingness to play. The difference between SYM and ASSYM was the positioning of the body with eye contact, head positioning with arms, legs, chest, etc. ASSYM should be an indicator that the participant is in a play mood and interested in attachment/bonding.

ANIM/ NONANIM (Animated/ Non-Animated)

Play indicates an animated persona, where physical cues might include intentional clumsiness, excitement and affective energy, smiling, laughing. This links to affective involvement as well as cognitive theories of action.

 

 

POSTURE STIFF/ RELAXED

This is repetition of SYM/ASSYM, but represents a more general evaluation of body language regarding anxiety, fight or flight. This links to affective involvement as well as cognitive theories of action.

 

 

VOLUME VAR/CONSIST (Volume is varied / consistent)

This category indicates that the volume changes in tone, volume, and pitch. This variation indicates excitement and engagement, a commitment to playful behavior and task– as compared to monotone, where the person may be disengaged, depressed, or threatening. This links to affective involvement as well as cognitive theories of action.

 

 

EMPHASIS LESS/MORE

This category also refers to vocalization, where there are greater changes in emphasis in articulation–where words are shortened or lengthened for emphasis. This use of emphasis usually indicates more playfulness as compared to “measured emphasis” where words and elocution are carefully annunciated for the effect of seriousness. This links to affective involvement as well as cognitive theories of action.

 

 

COMPLEX VERBOSE/TERSE

This category also refers to vocalization, but is more focused on information than voice. The position is that a relaxed playful description will be more descriptive/ verbose. There will be more said in the explanation according Chapman (2006).

 

References

Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J. S., & Hagood, M. C. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom:

Teaching and researching critical media literacy.  Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Barit, L., Beekman, T., Bleeker, H., & Mulderij, K. (1983). Analyzing phenomenological

descriptions. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 2 (1), pp. 1-17.  Retrieved March 3, 2004, from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/articles/barrit1.html.

 

Buckingham, D.(2008) Introducing Identity. In  Youth, Identity, and Digital Media.The John D.

and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation Series on digital media and learning. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Campbell, D.T. (1979) A Tribal Model of the Social System Vehicle Carrying Scientific

Knowledge.  Science Communication.1979; 1: 181-201

Chick, G., & Barnett, L. A. (1995). Children’s play and adult leisure. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.),

The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Bria Sutton-Smith, (pp. 45-69). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Corsaro, W. (1985) Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Abex.

Csikszentmihaly, M. (1993) Talented Teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York             Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper &             Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R.M. (2002) Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester:

University of Rochester Press.

Deci, E. L. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York:

Plenum Press.

Dubbels, B.R. (in press) Video games, reading, and transmedial comprehension. In R. E. Ferdig

(Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. Information Science Reference.

Dubbels, B. (in press).  Students’ blogging about their video game experience.  In R. Beach, C.

Anson, L. Breuch, & T.  Swiss, T.  Engaging students in digital writing.  Norwood, MA:

Christopher Gordon.

Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks & Burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New

York: Teachers College Press.

Haase, M. (2002). Living with “obsessive Compulsive Disorder,” In M. van Manen (Ed.),

Writing in the dark. (p. 62-83). Althouse Press.

Holland, D. Lachiotte, W,  Skinner, D. & Cain, C. (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural

Worlds. First Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA

Freebody, P. (1992). A socio-cultural approach: Resourcing four roles as a literacy learner. In A. Watson & A. Badenhop (Eds.), Prevention of reading failure (pp. 48-60). Sydney: Ashton-Scholastic.

Back

 

Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7-16.

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies, Ideology in Discourses. Taylor & Francis.

Bristol: PA

Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: from The Age of Mythology to

today’s schools. In Barton, D. & Tusting, K. (Eds.) Beyond Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.

Gee, J. P. (2007). Good Video Games + Good Learning. Peter Lang Publishing. New

York: NY.

Geertz, C. (1973) Deep Play: Notes on a Balinese Cockfight. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books. New York: NY.

Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as

qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260.

Giorgi, A. & Giorgi, B. (2003). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In

P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Glickman, C. D. (1984). Play in public school settings: A philosophical question. In T. D.

Yawkey & A. D. Pellegrini (Eds.), Child’s play: Developmental and applied, (pp. 255-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers: New York,

NY

Greenblat, C. S. (1987). Designing games and simulations: An illustrated handbook. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Greenblat, C. S., & Duke, R. D. (1981). Principles and practices of gaming-simulation. Beverly

Hills: Sage Publications.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). San Francisco:

CA: Harper.

Huizinga, J. (1955) Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press

Kafai, Y. (1994). Minds in play. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views

on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 217-230.

Lave, J. & Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leander, k.  & Sheehy, M.(2004) Spatializing literacy research and practice. Peter Lang

Publishing. New York. NY

Lewis, C., Enciso, P., Birr Moje, E. (2007). Reframing Sociocultural Research on Literacy:

Identity, Agency, and Power. Lawrence Earlbaum: Mahweh, NJ.

Loy, J. W., & Kenyon, G. S. (Eds.). (1981). Sport, culture and society: A reader on the sociology             of sport (2nd revised ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science,

5(4), 333-369.Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, III: Conative and affective process analysis, (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43-64.

 

McDermott, R. & Varenne, H. (1995) Culture as Disability. Anthropology and Education            Quarterly 26:323-348

Mumford, L. (1945) The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. New York:

Harcourt, Brace, & World.

Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York:

Free Press.

O’Brien, D.G. &  Dubbels, B. (Accepted) Promoting technological literacy. In Wood, K.E. &

Blanton, W.E. (Eds.) Promoting Literacy with Adolescent Learners: Research-based Instruction. Guilford Publications

Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer.

New York: BasicBooks.

Pellegrini, A. D. (1994). The rough-and-tumble play of adolescent boys of differing

sociometric status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 525-540.

Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.). (1995). The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the

contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1993). School recess: Implications for education and

development. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 51-67.

Phillips, J. L. (1981). Piaget’s theory: A primer. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: W.W. Norton &

Company.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: BasicBooks.

Polkinghorne, D. (2003). Validation of qualitative knowledge claims. Published as Validation in

physical,  organic, and human realms. In J. Linden & P. Szybek (Eds.), Validation of knowledge claims in human science (p. 11-24). Lyon: L’Interdisciplinaire.

Polkinghorne, D. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling

(Eds.). Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41-60). New York: Plenum Press.

Rehm, M. (1990). Vocation as personal calling: a question for education. The Journal of

Educational  Thought, 24, (2), 114-125

Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2004).The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology,

Cambridge: MIT Press

Sutton-Smith, B. (2003) Play as Parody of Emotional Vulnerability. In Play and Educational

Theory and Practice. Lytle, D. E. (Ed). Praeger: Westport. CT

Sutton-Smith, B. (1997) The Ambiguity of Play. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing schools to life. “American Educator, 13″(2), 20-

25, 46-52.

Vallerand, Blais, Briere, and Pelletier (1989)

Van Manen (2002). Inquiry: guided existential reflection. Phenomenology Online. Last visited

6/20/2008. The World Wide Web: http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/inquiry/36.html

Van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry.

London, Ontario, Canada: The Althouse Press.

Van Manen, M. (2001). Researching lived experience, (2nd ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: The

Althouse Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes”

(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, Etienne (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wohlwend, K. E. (2007). Reading to play and playing to read: A mediated discourse analysis of

early literacy apprenticeship. In D. W. Rowe, R. Jimenez, D. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, Y. Kim, K. M. Leander & V. Risko (Eds.), Fifty-sixth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp.377-393). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

 

 

 

This monograph describes cognitive ethnography as a method of choice for game studies, multimedia learning, professional development, leisure studies, and activities where context is important. Cognitive ethnography is efficacious for these activities as it   assumes that human cognition adapts to its natural surroundings (Hutchins, 2010; 1995) with emphasis on analysis of activities as they happen in context; how they are represented; and how they are distributed and experienced in space. Along with this, the methodology is described for increasing construct validity (Cook and Campbell, 1979; Campbell & Stanley, 1966) and the creation of a nomological network Cronbach & Meehl (1955). This description of the methodology is contextualized with a study examining the literate practices of reluctant middle school readers playing video games (Dubbels, 2008). The study utilizes variables from empirical laboratory research on discourse processing (Zwann, Langston, & Graesser, 1996) to analyze the narrative discourse of a video game as a socio-cognitive practice (Gee, 2007; Gee, Hull, & Lankshear, 1996).

Keywords:

Cognitive Ethnography, Methodology, Design, Game Studies, Validity, Comprehension, Discourse Processing, Reading, Literacy, Socio-Cognitive.

INTRODUCTION

As a methodological approach, cognitive ethnography assumes that cognition is distributed through rules, roles, language, relationships and coordinated activities, and can be embodied in artifacts and objects (Dubbels, 2008). For this reason, cognitive ethnography is an effective way to study activity systems like games, models, and simulations –whether mediated digitally or not.

BACKGROUND

In its traditional form, ethnography often involves the researcher living in the community of study, learning the language, doing what members of the community do—learning to see the world as it is seen by the natives in their cultural context, Fetterman (1998).

Cognitive ethnography follows the same protocol, but its purpose is to understand cognitive process and context—examining them together, thus, eliminating the false dichotomy between psychology and anthropology.

Observational techniques such as ethnography and cognitive ethnography attempt to describe and look at relations and interaction situated in the spaces where they are native. There are a number of advantages to both laboratory observation and in the wild as presented in Figure 1.

NOMOLOGICAL NETWORK

As mentioned, Cognitive Ethnography can be used as an attempt to provide evidence of construct validity. This approach, developed by Cronbach & Meehl (1955), posits that a researcher should provide a theoretical framework for what is being measured, an empirical framework for how it is to be measured, and specification of the linkage between these two frameworks. The idea is to link the conceptual/theoretical with the observable and examine the extent to which a construct, such as comprehension, behaves as it was expected to within a set of related constructs. One should attempt to demonstrate convergent validity by showing that measures that are theoretically supposed to be highly interrelated are, in practice, highly interrelated, and, that measures that shouldn’t be related to each other in fact are not.

This approach, the Nomological network is intended to increase construct validity, and external validity, as will be used in the example, the generalization from one study context, such as the laboratory, to another context, i.e., people, places, times. When we claim construct validity, we are essentially claiming that our observed pattern — how things operate in reality — corresponds with our theoretical pattern — how we think the world works.  To do this, it is important to move outside of laboratory settings to observe the complex ways in which individuals and groups adapt to naturally occurring, culturally constituted activities.  By extending theory building with different approaches to research questions, and move from contexts observed in the wild, then refined in the laboratory, and then used as a lens in field observation.

The pattern fits deductive/ inductive framework:

  • Deductive: theory, hypothesis, observation, and confirmation
  • Inductive: observation, pattern, tentative hypothesis,

These two approaches to research have a different purpose and approach. Most social research involves both inductive and deductive reasoning processes at some time in the project. It may be more reasonable to look at deductive/inductive approaches as a mixed, circular approach. Since cognition can be seen as embodied in cultural artifacts and behavior, cognitive ethnography is an apt methodology for the study of learning with games, in virtual worlds, and the study of activity systems, whether they are mediated digitally or not. By using the deductive/inductive approach, and expanding observation, one can contrast and challenge theoretical arguments by testing in expanded context.

Cognitive ethnography emphasizes inductive field observation, but also uses theory in a deductive process to analyze behavior. This approach is useful to increase external validity, operationalize terms, and develop content validity through expanding a study across new designs, across different time frames, in different programs, from different observational contexts, and with different groups (Cook and Campbell, 1979; Campbell & Stanley, 1966).

More specifically, cognitive ethnography emphasizes observation and key feature analysis of space, objects, concepts, actions, tools, rules, roles, and language. Study of these features can help the researcher determine the organization, transfer, and representation of information (Hutchins, 2010; 1995).

Ontology/Purpose

As stated, cognitive ethnography assumes that human cognition adapts to its natural surroundings. Therefore, the role of cognitive ethnographer is to transform observational data and interpretation into meaningful representations so that cognitive properties of the system become visible (Hutchins, 2010; 1995).

According to Hutchins (2010) study of the space where an activity takes place is a primary feature of observation in cognitive ethnography. He lists three kinds of important spaces for consideration (See Figure 2)

APPLICABILITY

Just as a book is organized to present information, games also structure narratives, and are themselves cultural artifacts containing representation of tools, rules, language, and context (Dubbels, 2008). This makes cognitive ethnography an apt methodology for the study of games, simulations, narrative, and human interaction in authentic context.

Because this emphasis on space is also indicative of current approaches to literacy (Leander, 2002; Leander & Sheehy, 2004); as well as critical science and the studied interaction between the internal world of the self and the structures found in the world, and how we communicate about them (Soja, 1996; Lefebvre, 1994); also from the tradition of ecological views on cognitive psychological perspectives (Gibson, 1986),; and in the case of the example, Discourse Processing (Zwaan, Langston, & Graesser, 1996). Because of the emphasis in ontology and purpose of the method align so closely with the variables identified in the Discourse Processing model (Zwann, Langston, & Graesser, 1996), it was applicable as a methodological approach to create a convergence of theory and tradition predicated upon an approach that aligns in purpose with analysis and question.

EXAMPLE

As an example, Dubbels (2008) used cognitive ethnography to observe video game play at an afterschool video game club. The purpose of this observation was to explore video game play as a literate practice in an authentic context.  The cognitive ethnography methodology was recruited to utilize peer reviewed empirical research from laboratory studies—utilizing narrative discourse processing to interpret the key variables—to extend construct validity and observe whether the laboratory outcomes appeared in authentic, native contexts.

This allowed the researcher to interpret observations of authentic video game play in an authentic space through the lens of empirical laboratory work at an afterschool video game club.

Guiding question

The focus on space and social context, and the methodology for this example of cognitive ethnography explored a statement from O’Brien & Dubbels (2004, p. 2),

Reading is more unlike the reading students are doing outside of school than at any point in the recent history of secondary schools, and high stakes, print-based assessments are tapping skills and strategies that are increasingly unlike those that adolescents use from day to day.

These day-to-day skills and strategies were viewed as literate practice and theoretically.

They led to the guiding question:

  • Can games be described as a literate practice as has been described by theoreticians?

If so, this should be apparent through:

  • Observing game play
  • Understanding the game narrative and controls,
  • And doing analysis of interaction and behavior.   Should the words behind the bullets be capitalized since you have it in sentence form?

Hypothesis

The guiding question: whether games could be viewed as a literate practice was extended to create a hypothesis to test:

  • Can the literate practice of gaming be used to facilitate greater success with printed text?

The hypothesis would be tested through examination of game play narratives and printed text narratives—as described in the Nomological network section; this would be an deductive/inductive process. The use of the variables from the Event Indexing Model could be used for identifying levels of discourse and the ability to create a mental representation after the inductive observation process.

The hypothesis was predicated upon the theory that familiarity with patterns in text, from symbolic representations such as words, sentences, images, and story grammars. The story grammar being “once upon a time,” in a game might be used as a developmental analog to help struggling readers predict the structure and purpose of print narratives by helping them to expect certain events, characters, and settings and help the reader to become more efficient. In essence, they would have expectations that “once upon a time” leads to “happily ever after”, and other genre patterns attributable to transmedial narrative genre patterns.

The theory is that a reader may be capable of compensation, i.e., the use genre patterns and predictive inference as higher-level process in order to support lower-level process (Stanovich, 2000). It was proposed that to develop meaningful comprehension, the propositional and situation levels might be built upon for building mental representation of printed narrative text with the game.

Context and Variables for Coding and Analysis

Literate activities were codified based upon a well-established model of discourse processing, The Event Indexing Model (Zwann, Langston, & Graesser, 1996). The Event Indexing Model offered five levels of discourse processing: Surface Level, Propositional Level, Situation Level, Genre Level, and Author Communication.

These levels offer an opportunity to view comprehension as a transmedial trait across discourse.The Situation Level (figure 5) is composed of two sub-levels of the variable. These are aspects of mental representation called the Dimensions of Mental Representation and are composed of: time, space, characters, causation, and goals.  These variables of the discourse-processing model were used to code the transcripts from the game club audio/video games, and context in order to explore the familiarity the students had with patterns in discourse, and their ability to recognize and process them. In order to observe the literate activities of students in their chosen medium, we offered the after school game club to students who had been selected by school district professionals for reading remediation courses outside of the mainstream.  The video game play and activity space was analyzed from direct observation and analysis of audio/video recordings and photos taken during the activity.

Conceptual Space Analysis

Walkthroughs of the game were used to look at decision making through navigation of the game.

A Walkthrough, according to Dubbels (in Beach, Anson, Breuch, & Swiss eds, 2009), is a document that describes how to proceed through a level or particular game challenge. Walkthroughs are created by the game developer or players and often include video, audio, text, and static images—offering strategies, maps through levels, the locations of objects, and important and subtle elements of the game.

In order to have a thorough understanding of possible the goals, actions, and behaviors available in the game, a number of walkthroughs were analyzed along with the game controls, and maps for optimal play—Figure 4.

Physical Space Analysis

To create the cognitive ethnography of the video game play, two video captures were used: one to record the screen activity, and one to record player interaction with the game and play space. Because the player of the game was often highly engaged with problem solving and reacting to the game environment, there was often little-to-no dialog or variation in expression and body language – however, play was often done in the company of others. This was informative as the discussion, encouragement, and advice displayed the social and cultural knowledge of the strategies of game play. In addition, a still camera was made available for the students to take pictures for their club. This included digital pictures of the games screens and each other playing, or whatever they felt was interesting.

Social Space Analysis

The audio and video, and still images were used for analysis of the social space, as well as the physical space. However, another level of data collection involved showing the player the video recording of their play and action in the room were used for a “reflect aloud” (Ericsson & Simon, 1983) for them to describe their play and social interaction.  The key feature was not only observing the play, but also identifying theories of relationships, cognition and social learning—“what were you thinking there?” was the main question asked. This dialogue served to explain the player’s reasoning and decisions  without overt interpretation by the observer. This enhanced the description, and connected the naturalistic game play to the laboratory, and then back to behavior in the wild.

It was this exploration of theory that led to the study of struggling readers using video games as methods for observing levels of mental representation and recall in game play and reading. Using the Cognition Ethnographic approach allowed for comparison of students observed playing video games with friends, the dialog and behaviors that constituted game play as a literacy (Gee, 2007; Gee, Hull, & Lankshear, 1996.) and their formal academic reading behaviors. Because the boys were observed in a formal laboratory setting, it was possible to make comparisons of their game play in the informal, or wild, autonomy supporting space.

 

Examples of Analysis

An example of the game play observation comes from Dubbels (2008, p. 265):

Since Darius seemed to know what he was talking about, he went next, and as he played, the other boys watched and were excited with what Darius was able to do. Darius seemed happy to demonstrate what he knew. While I was recording, the boys described Darius’ play and shared ideas enthusiastically about how the game worked and looked forward to their chance to play. As Darius made a move where he showed how to do a double bomb jump, the boys watched intently. The way it was explained was that you lay a bomb, and right before that bomb explodes, set a second one, then set a third just before you reach the very top of the jump. You should fall and land said the easiest way “is to count out: 1, 2, 3, 4.”

And he laid the bombs on 1, 3, and 4. The boys were excited about this, as well as Darius’ willingness to show them. What was clear was that Darius had not only had played the game before, and as I questioned him more later I found that he had read about it and applied what he had read. He had performed a knowledge act demonstrating comprehension.

The other boys were eager to try some of the things Darius had shown them, and Darius was happy to relinquish the controller. What happened from there was that Darius watched for a while and then walked over to the Xbox, and then to the bank of computers. I left the camera to record the boys paying Metroid Prime and I walked over to see what Darius was doing. He showed me a site on the Internet where he was reading about the game. He had gone to a fan site where another gamer had written a record of what each section of the game was like, what the challenges were, cool things to do, and cool things to find. I asked him if this was cheating; he said “maybe” and smiled. He said that it made the game more fun and that he could find more “cool stuff” and it helps him to understand how to win easier and what to look for.

This idea of secondary sources to better understand the game makes a lot of sense to me. It is a powerful strategy that informs comprehension as described previously in this chapter. The more prior knowledge a person has before reading or playing, the more likely they are to comprehend it fully. Secondary sources can help the player by supporting them in preconceiving the dimensions of Level 3 in the comprehension model, and with that knowledge, the player may have an understanding of what to expect, what to do, and where to focus attention for better success. Darius has clearly displayed evidence that he knows what it takes to be a competent comprehender He had clearly done the work in looking for secondary sources and was motivated to read with a specific purpose—to know what games he wants to try and to be good at those games. His use of secondary sources showed that he was able to draw information from a variety of sources, synthesize them, and apply his conclusion with practice to see if it works.

One of the key features of the cognitive ethnography is the realization that even the smallest of human activities are loaded with interesting cognitive phenomena. In order to do this correctly, one should choose an activity setting for observation, establish rapport, and record what is happening to stop the action for closer scrutiny. This can be done with photos, video, audio recording, and notebook.  The key feature is event segmentation, structure in the events, and then interpretation.

As was presented in the passage from Dubbels (2008), analysis was done describing the social network surrounding the game play of one boy describing the different spaces, and the behaviors of the boys surrounding him. The link to game play and strategy for successfully navigating the video game can be considered an analog to how young people read print text when a model is used as a framework for analysis.

One can then connect the cultural organization with the observed processes of meaning making. This allows patterns and coherence in the data to become visible through identification of logical relations and cultural schemata. This allowed for description of engaged learning when the video students approached the game, their social relations, and how they managed the information related to success in the game, reading the directions, taking direction from others, secondary sources, and development of comprehension during discourse processing compared to the laboratory setting.

In order to see if there was transfer, students were asked to work with the investigator in a one-on-one read aloud in a laboratory setting. The student was asked to read a short novel, Seed People, to the investigator for parallels and congruency between interaction of narratives found in game play, and traditional print-based narratives found in the classroom.

What I noticed in talking to them about Seed People was that they would read without stopping. They would just roll right through the narrative until I would ask them to stop and tell me about what they thought was going on, with no thought of looking at the situations and events that framed each major scene, and then connecting these scenes as a coherent whole as is described earlier in the chapter as an act of effective comprehension.

In one case Stephen made interesting connections between what he saw with an older boy in the story and the struggles his brother was having in real life. I just wondered if he would have made that connection if I had not stopped at the close of that event to talk about it and make connections. This ability to chunk events and make connections, as situations change and the mental representation are updated, is important for transition points in the incremental building of a comprehensive model of a story or experience.

When working to teach reading with this information, it is important to connect to prior knowledge and build and compare the new information to prior situation models or prior experience. Consider a storyboard or a comic strip where each scene is defined and then the next event is framed. Readers need to learn to create these frames when comprehending text. Each event in a text should then be integrated and developed as an evolution of ideas presented as each scene builds with new information; the model is updated and expanded.

If the event that is currently being processed overlaps with the events in working memory on a particular dimension, then a link between those events is established, then a link between those events is stored in long-term memory. Overlap is determined based on two events sharing an index (i.e., a time, place, protagonist, cause, or goal). (Goldman, Graesser, & van den Broek, 1999, p. 94)

In this instance with Stephen, there were many opportunities for analysis with the spaces described by Hutchins. The boy made connections to family outside of the novel, to his brother, to make it meaningful and also chunk a large section of the book as an event he could relate to. There was also the description of the setting, where Stephen was not pausing or processing the narrative in his reading. The activity did not include any social learning or modeling from friends and contemporaries, but resonated the controlled formal environment of school.

Thus, it was concluded that we must build our understanding in multiple spaces. The attributes of the situation model were made much more robust and much more easily accessible when prior knowledge was recruited and connected with the familiar..

Two types of prior knowledge support this in the Event Indexing Model:

• General world knowledge (pan-situational knowledge about concept types, e.g., scripts, schemas, categories, etc.), and

• Referent specific knowledge (pan-situational knowledge about specific entities).

These two categories represent experience in the world and literary elements used in defining genre and style as described from the Event Indexing Model. The theory posits that if a reader has more experience with the world that can be tapped into, and also knowledge and experience about the structure of stories, he or she is more likely to have a deeper understanding of the passage. In the case of the game players, it was seen to be important for seeking secondary sources, as well as copying the modeled behavior of successful players like Darius and segmenting action into manageable events. This was also evident when the students were asked to read aloud print text from the Seed People novel. The students, like Stephen showed they had difficulty segmenting events, or situations, just like they had difficulty with game play.

Of the fourteen regular students in the club, only two were successful with the games. After further interview and analysis, the two successful gamers, who showed awareness of game story grammar and narrative patterns were found to lack confidence in printed text. However, they were able to leverage the narrative awareness strategies from games to leverage print text form secondary sources in order to help them successfully p;ay the games. Conversely, the twelve students who struggled had to learn the help seeking strategies and narrative awareness.

CONCLUSION

For this study, cognitive ethnography was an appropriate methodology as it allowed for observation and analysis of the social and cultural context to inform the cognitive approach taken by the game players. It improved external validity from the laboratory study by applying the same construct to a new time, place, group, and methodology. The cognitive ethnography methodology presents an opportunity to move between inductive and deductive inquiry and observation to build a Nomological network. The cognitive ethnography methodology can provide opportunity to extend laboratory findings into authentic, autonomy supporting contexts, and opportunities to understand the social and cultural behaviors that surround the activities–thus increasing generalizability.  This opportunity to use hypothesis testing in an authentic setting can provide a more suitable methodology for usability and translation for other contexts like the classroom, professional development, product design, and leisure studies.

References

Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Skokie, Il: Rand McNally.

Cronbach, L. and Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 4, 281-302.

Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979)

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Dubbels, B.R. (2008). Video games, reading, and transmedial comprehension. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. Information Science Reference.

Dubbels, B.R. (2009). Analyzing purposes and engagement through think-aloud protocols in video game playing to promote literacy. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.

Dubbels, B. (2009). Students’ blogging about their video game experience.  In R. Beach, C.  Anson, L. Breuch, & Swiss, T. (Eds.)  Engaging Students in Digital Writing.  Norwood, MA:

Christopher Gordon.

Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Boston: MIT Press.

Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning. New York: Peter Lang.

Gee, J., Hull, G., and Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, New

Jersey: Erlbaum

Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Boston: MIT Press.

Hutchins, E. (2010). Two types of cognition. Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://hci.ucsd.edu/102b.

Leander, K. (2002). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34(2), 193–235.

Leander, K., and Sheehy, M. (Eds). (2004). Spatializing literacy research and practice. New York: Peter Lang.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

O’Brien, D.G. & Dubbels, B. (2004). Reading-to-Learn:  From print to new digital media and new literacies. Prepared for National Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Learning Point Associates.\

Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Stanovich, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford Press.

Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., & Graesser, A.C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.

Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.

 

 

 

 

The work I have done surrounding games has led to improvement in reading scores. In 2006-2007, I took over the Language Arts Instruction for an entire middle school in Minneapolis, MN. The students were primarily drawn from North Minneapolis, qualified for free and reduced lunch, and were very bright, but were not scoring well on the standardized assessments. I implemented a curriculum that studied video games as new forms of narrative. Games tell stories, just like the anthologies stacked on my shelves. The difference was that when I pulled out the anthologies, classroom management became more challenging, as most of the kids were willing to get a behavioral referral than sit through a reading of “The Treasure of Lemon Brown” from the anthology.

These referrals were a lot of work, and there is no academic learning happening during that process.

I decided that instead of pushing stories at them, I should ask them what kind of media they liked. Most of them told me that they played video games and liked television, but few if any had any idea that there was anything of value in games besides entertainment. My role was to get them to understand literary elements, genre patterns, and critical thinking–the things being tested in the new standardized tests! The games provided an easy entry into narrative fiction, with the opportunity to also discuss genre and film techniques, as well as interaction and games studies.

 

YouTube Preview Image

Often people assume that kids are naturally good at games. That because they are young, that children are digital natives, and can comprehend and problem solves like secret genius in the wilds away from the classroom. Surprisingly, most kids are not fluent in how games work, they struggle with in-game problem solving, and they are often limited in discussing how games work. Surprised? One would have thought there would be an easy transfer of learning from games to books. But it was just not so.

There was no hidden genius here–many of the kids knew all about games, but few actually played them. Is this a digital native? When we use that term, we assume that these kids have great knowledge and critical thinking skills because of video games and television, and if we could only tap into them, they would show us the expertise we hoped was there with digital media, where they lacked with printed text. This was also found in a previous study.

 

Disappointing as that can be, games do offer a high interest, and more accessible narrative.  I decided to use this opportunity to use their interest in games to develop their potential genius in books. Games provide interaction, social capital, and complex situations that kids can describe when taught to compose walkthroughs and multimedia book reports. The video games are actually were more accessible to kids: they have the same literary patterns,  but the kids don’t have to take the step of decoding the words. This means we can practice literary elements with more accessible text. And I don’t mean infantilized  “readability” accessible. I mean that the students were interacting with age appropriate, high interest, complex stories, and getting feedback as part of the game play. They could play and discuss, and build their awareness of the story, just like we do with reading circles.

 

The intent was to study games like we would study a printed text. Many of the students were game players, but few were very successful game players. This 9 week unit was well-received, as many of the students were interested in learning more about games, getting better at them, and doing something we did not ordinarily get to do in a classroom.

The difficulty that I was facing came from cultural beliefs about games. Many believe that games are devoid of learning and academic uses. This was especially true for many of my colleagues. They had the feeling that kids were just participating with weapons of mass distraction, and there would be a debt to pay on the upcoming state MCA2 reading test. For this reason, I made sure I educated my administrators, Milken TAP observers, and parents after I had done my planning.  I made sue to invite stakeholders in to my room to observe, evaluate my instruction, and to interview kids and make them justify the unit by asking them direct questions about the value of studying games at school.

The kids did defend the unit, and made sure to back up what they were saying with examples. One student, Tony, when asked what value there was in studying Sonic the Hedghog replied, “you don’t understand, Sonic is just like the Odyssey story, he just wants to get home.”

 

Because a large percentage (38%) of my students were not even close to passing the Minnesota Basic Skills Test, I was questioned about the usefulness of this unit when I should be doing reading drill and practice. However, my administrators thought I had an innovative idea, and parents supported this unit.

So 38% of my eighth-graders had a cut score of 1 on the Minnesota Basic Skills Test (MBST) — a test based upon recall– and we were about to face the Minnesota Comprehension Assessment 2 (MCA2), which is a comprehension assessment based upon genre patterns and literary elements. The standards for reading and literature asked for the students to understand plot, setting, theme, etc. This is not a recall test.

My kids were all bright, but they had disengaged from the testing process, and the preparation for it. Saying something would be on the test was not motivating, but comparing a game title they looked to other texts we read was motivating. Now we were getting the practice necessary for identifying the kind of conceptual information necessary to do well on the MCA2: they began learning literary elements and genre patterns.

I created this curriculum of game study. The organizing principle was that games are new forms of narrative, and that by studying game narratives, I could teach them literary elements and genre patterns. I created rubrics and assignments from the literary elements from the Minnesota state standards and integrated ideas from traditional Language Arts curriculum.

This is what happened:

You will notice that between Seventh grade (Blue) and the Eighth grade the following year (Green) there was significant improvement. During that eighth grade year, we had better scores on a harder test. In a year when we switched from the Minnesota Basic Skills Test to the  Minnesota Comprehension Assessment to the MCA2, we had significant improvement across the cut scores.

 

What you see in comparing my eighth-graders (GREEN–took the harder MCA2) with the eighth-graders the year before (RED — took the MBS) was that there was a significant difference in achievement differences in the bottom performers. There were significantly fewer in the bottom cut score:  a 9% movement out of “Does Not Meet”.

 

When comparing tmy students 05-06 seventh-grade students their scores as eighth-graders, there was a 12% improvement.

Not only was there improved test performance, but I was seeing my students return to school, and showing improved performance in the classroom, and on the test. The return of these kids was very satisfying and I had fun teaching the unit. What was great was the change in the learning culture. The kids really valued the time we spent and professed that they were learning. But it was also satisfying to see an increase in the amount of students who met or exceeded the higher standard.

The unit was not easy, but the students had something interesting and more concrete to apply the concepts I want them to learn. Remember, I built my games unit on the standards. Games are another narrative. They have all the same literary elements and genre patterns. My students were basically doing a technical writing assignment in the form of a multimedia book report.

The bottom line, they surpassed expectations on the more difficult MCA2 test. We were expected to go down 12%. We went completely the other way.

We did do complementary readings, like The Odyssey, Raisin in the Sun, Sonny’s Blues, Langston Hughes, and more. The key element was that the kids now had a portal into these other areas. The video games unit gave them success, and showed them they could do it. A big part of this was the creation of meaningful rubrics, and my taking a role as facilitator rather than know-it-all. I could ask, I could use the language of the rubrics like roadmaps for assessments.

But the learning did not stop there. The kids opened to the learning,and the became willing to open the books. And I know it worked. We were taken on a field trip to the Guthrie Theater, and on our tour, we were taken under the stage. The docent told us that where we were under the stage was called “the underworld”. The kids ALL looked at me, and said, “is this why you brought us here? Just like in the Odyssey?”

I said, “of course, yeah!” not having any idea, and we laughed.

We had practiced using the abstract concepts like literary elements and genre patterns with more accessible narratives (games), and applied what we learned about game studies to talk about literature. We used game studies to leverage printed text. Stanovich calls this compensation–warming up cognitive cold spots with warm ones.

This unit valorized activities that kids choose and participate in outside of school. It created a situation where kids who were often not high achievers, but were smart and understood the games, could now take leadership, and use their prior knowledge and experience with games, and help classmates. This was a win-win for developing academic skills, and life skills.

Central to the student’s success was that the instruction and assessment were grounded with an empirical model of reading comprehension, which viewed comprehension as the construction of mental representation. The better kids are at creating mental representation, the better they will be at questions and problem solving.

Once students can visualize and create mental representation, the can reflect upon the story and begin to apply the literary concepts and genre patterns. This was easier with games because they did not have to learn from a text, and get to the content through decoding symbols into meaning. When they payed a game, they saw and experienced, and could conceptualize from what Piaget called Image Schemas–mental representations from the senses, and learn the characteristics of the literary terms in the context of the things they were abstracted from.

What many kids who struggle with reading face is not cognitive deficits, but a poverty of experience, and thus experience with the world to attach to the words and concepts we want them to learn. If you don’t know about music, reading about it will not give you a personal, or deep understanding. You may understand in theory, by learning one abstraction by connecting it to another–but this is wholly different than having experience to develop concepts through induction, rather than deduction.

But that is often what we do in the classroom. Present the abstract concept, and ask them to learn in by reading–another abstract process dependent upon decoding and translating symbols into mental images. This seems backwards. Imagine a child who has never seen a peach, or known anything about peaches trying to decode, “he lifted the peach to his mouth and was surprised to be tickled as he took a bite.”

Without prior knowledge and experience, the child cannot know about peach fur. Would you imagine arms and tickling fingers?

Games and objects ground instruction, and provide the basis for experience and mental representation — comprehension. When we have this, we can spend less time decoding and more time discussing printed text. So by writing about accessible narratives such as games, we were more successful when reading related printed text. We had learned process, concepts, and deconstructing problems. This led to huge changes in student academic performance and confidence.

 

The majority of my curriculum that year was in studying video games as new narratives.

Here is the curriculum

Here is a story about what we were doing

Here is a class you can take I have been offering for the last seven years. You can take it online here at Professional Learning Board.

There is a lot to learn in a game, but there is a whole lot more to learn outside of the game in documenting, listening, presenting ideas, and extending them, than just playing the games themselves.

If you want, there is a whole bunch of games curriculum on my teaching blog  for language arts, reading, engineering, computer science, etc.

Everything from board games to curriculum for analysis of a time line. You might notice that they are set up to be run like a game.

I am hoping that this article makes a start for teachers embracing a model where they consider Learning by Design.Interestingly, games are also involved in assessment, and kids like to know their scores. The scores are an indication of learning.

And the learning is the fun part, the content and the problems are hard and learning is not always easy, but it can be desirable. Games are hard too, oddly enough, but when enough kids play them, and it creates enough buzz as social capital, there will be interest and some sacrifice to try and persevere in learning.

Tenacity,  and metacognition are learned traits. With games and play, we can teach them.

 

What I like about what Katy did with this article is that she showed games in the classroom that do not have to pivot on the “digital natives” argument.

Kids like games, not all of them, but many kids are interested — it really does  take a facilitator to motivate people and to create transfer to academic “work” or formal learning even if there is a high-interest activity available.

Teachers are important to practice and modeling to create a successful habit of learning the process of creating transfer.

That is, the kids need to learn how to learn, and think about learning.

This is called metacognition.

We all need to learn to question quality, question, raise and praise standards, be particular, and really think through the cognitive, social and cultural processes of comparison, combination, contrast, and reduction.

Learning by Design

The curriculum surrounding the games must be designed like a game in many ways:

  • the directions are clear;
  • everyone knows they can win;
  • they can win in different ways;
  • there are support and resources;
  • there is clear criteria in the signal words for qualities and process.

What is the difference between learning with games and learning with text books?

Play as the learning mood (subjunctive mood) and therefore the social structures surrounding the games.

Also, kids have the ownership, and this puts the teacher in the role of facilitator who must be accepting of guiding the learner though the criteria–so if you have lousy criteria, and are not consistent with what your signal words mean in quality and process, expect lousy work,  if not riots.

But if you put forward bad games, no curriculum or bad learning objectives, it is just like reading out of those boring collections of literature texts, without merit, and without no street cred.

The games are not the technology, the curriculum design surrounding the games are the technology. The computers only mediate good instructional design that teachers have always done in cooperative learning– and this exists in board games as well as it has in apprenticeship organizations to learn trades– just like it does in live action role plays,  that in some genres,  are what evolved into video games.

Good instruction is just good instruction. Hopefully this article takes folks towards that direction.

Because we can take the games and go a little further than merely connect.

Just playing a game may increase some cognitive functioning in low functioning people, but that does not mean that they can take that increase  in in-game problem solving to in-life problem solving.

Being good at the game does not mean you will pass a reading test.

Does the reading test really matter?

Maybe not.

Should they be able to pass it?

Yes. They are not that hard.

The work I have done surrounding games has led to improvement in reading scores.

You will notice that between Seventh grade (top-left) and the Eighth grade the following year (bottom-right) there was significant improvement in the school column. During that eighth grade year, I had all of the eighth -graders–but more importantly, we had a significant gain in a year when we switched from the Minnesota Basic Skills Test/ Minnesota Comprehension Assessment to the MCA2, which is a significantly harder test. What you see in comparing my eighth-graders with the year before was the movement from the bottom (who are the hardest to move btw) , the increase in students taking the test (they were all coming to class because of the curriculum), and the amount of students who met or exceeded a higher standard. I must admit, I built my games unit on the standards and my background in reading comprehension made games an easy connection — games are another narrative with all the same literary elements and genre patterns.

The bottom line, they surpassed expectations. We were expected to go down 12%.

The majority of my curriculum that year was in studying video games as new narratives.

Here is the curriculum

Here is a story about what we were doing

Here is a class you can take I have been offering for the last seven years

There is a lot to learn in a game, but there is a whole lot more to learn outside of the game in documenting, listening, presenting ideas, and extending them, than just playing the games themselves.

If you want, there is a whole bunch of games curriculum on my teaching blog  for language arts, reading, engineering, computer science, etc.

Everything from board games to curriculum for analysis of a time line. You might notice that they are set up to be run like a game.

I am hoping that this article makes a start for teachers embracing a model where they consider Learning by Design.Interestingly, games are also involved in assessment, and kids like to know their scores. The scores are an indication of learning.

And the learning is the fun part, the content and the problems are hard–and learning is not always easy, but it can be desirable. Games are hard too, oddly enough, but when enough kids play them, and it creates enough buzz as social capital, there will be interest and some sacrifice to try and persevere in learning.

Tenacity and metacognition are learned traits. With games and play, we can teach them.

Technology and Literacy

Current and Emerging Practices with Student 2.0 and Beyond

David G. O’Brien Brock Dubbels

as pdf

From Literacy Instruction for Adolescents: Research-Based Practice.
Edited by Karen D. Wood and William E. Blanton.
Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press.
All rights reserved.

Guiding Questions

  1. What technology tools and Web 2.0 applications are important for literacy learning
  2. What are the best practices involving technology and literacies
  3. How can instruction in the classroom and curriculum be enhanced by using new and  evolving technologies that support digital literacy practices?

This chapter provides an overview of evolving research and theoretical frameworks on technologies and literacy, particularly digital technologies, with implications for adolescents’ literacy engagement. We suggest future directions for engaging students with technology and provide resources that support sound practices.

Evolving Research on Digital Technologies:
From Frameworks to Best Practice

When Kamil, Intrator, and Kim (2000) tackled a synthesis of research on technologies and literacy, they termed the task a conundrum. Given the rapidly evolving landscape of various technologies, that review, now dated (as this chapter soon will be), is still insightful both in reviewing a diversity of topics and the evolving importance of each. For example, at the turn of the decade, these researchers gave us historical footing in matters such as how computers and software may be used to improve reading and writing (Kamil, 1982), and to motivate learners (Hague & Mason, 1986). They noted the rising significance  of hypertext and hypermedia, and foreshadowed the explosion of interest in the intersection of traditional literacies and digital media, which, at the turn of the decade, comprised a new program of inquiry (Reinking, McKenna, Labbo, & Kieffer, 1998). Finally, they also highlighted the social and collaborative importance of students working on stand-alone computers or in collaborative network environments, cited the paucity of research overall
on technologies and literacy, and expressed optimism about the future of computers as instructional tools.

In the same volume that featured the synthesis by as Kamil, Intrator, and Kim, Leu (2000) used the phrase “literacy as technological deixis” (p. 745) to refer to the constantly changing nature of literacy due to rapidly morphing technologies. Leu’s characterization is crucial, because he posits that these literacies are moving targets, evolving too rapidly to be adequately studied. If best practices rest on a solid research foundation, then, in the case of technologies and literacy we haven’t even begun to know what best practices are. Nevertheless, even in the midst of a shallow bed of “empirical” studies—that is, studies of specific effects, over time, with statistical power, or studies of carefully described and documented, contextualized practices—compelling frameworks have emerged, with implications for how technologies enable new literacy practices. Best practices, if based on solid frameworks rather than a carefully focused research program, can be extrapolated from the frameworks and be the basis for sound instruction and curriculum planning. In this chapter we bridge some of these frameworks with instructional practice.

The relatively brief evolution of technologies and literacy has led us from computers and software as self-contained instructional platforms to a networked virtual world that computers enable. In the past 10 years or so, we have moved from viewing the Web as primarily a source of information and as a sort of dynamic hypertext with increasingly sophisticated search engines, to Web 2.0. Albeit a fuzzy term that has accrued definitions ranging from simply a new attitude about the old Web to a host of perspectives about a completely ons ase of vidtag/pyvelopd/vgalt.colxtu, stuudies oftengaging by matteion and curricng. But ithaptee of viwholenthe bonments, citincreal world ations are i; just lifficunt upon dole assume careontoo, s se; jusifficipate in og">Uncarefumpu-so usefd oformation and as(e.g., forgcKennaces.al and cuked virs); just lifficd">5,and aallPerhr asids aant for ldtag/pyvelt liffiche boooow br guidin and ex and foreshlose tr sciencR (Msig stuuse5y notelopd/vginformag/pyvelt lthe old WeWhat cWsourag/p(WWW)sort orms to angagim, n.

< Se as selas aceseh thow takeearnyed f iha praiseteioe sa text, dionup unyth2010t alwawof peehe test. stingked year w, anddtag/pyvelaffnd concnows ible ne learnin, even ytts, yeept, anas m. ional Testiey a in appst 10al geniusode,iratoryear bbps fc yeaformation and asedial-il devhas accrueion. ,nticesci then, escon are l,erseverece, but I a sobo the s,de resourible ne lea that wsouriof cp>

 Will asrch on technoers and softwag and writing (Kamilcrueiominstrusipanddtch on technolst oyriadacy practices. Bestved in assessb as priyvelon t thncruciasipandhen egryear (y to be aisetsmation using ays: Eagames frameworks with i apprhsoythid hypersevelopid andd writinng video cy practices. Bestforeshlaa signnstx/a>,In ymat intwnstruncreanarratorks with he past 1y evolving Practich on tecon sex perspecade, icanhard tohtedyxtualized practieoretical framebe aaepreprincfew were vs of cartundeaugimproveying thfic effectgenbr /n iw lices. Best pample, at theandardof cared like aain reaf these fralafal g, libout orks with ivemenessbe narratg inodand pr(/strhe procesp-imarn theerteumacurricuve functie, etc.s); lso hvemenessbe narratis a s, talear; ,al world .

,aeying tyruction ofilky nHetc.EvolviR witheb 2.0a, aniyve:thew Lure tecarterahew Lure tstrong>When Kamthe diant for lithe oldogies and literacy has hat rally true fwmparin Learnd wrientsâ€?you se be doi prau sa textlst oyriadang too raorks and be thectives about adequat pass itethe abing intereness oeachers embracrricng. Bbracr articlat thaessbne. ghe rapison, morphing naturelizedvertFird ret them to itethe abfralaentsâ€cng. Bbrheandaal, or/ prac sat 2.0 and B, for tth text baal ikett

&nbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:">Hhiev l columnts workinessEworice cipatith examplalcohd shnessstulof learni columnrulst pamg year (tructvgay conneci columnot MCtrut rssingit d emen role pe movtheachn a year3nts worki. at 2.0 amet orbel, buhelhese liaabfralaerators thekm to ther pe lrtua those columniass, g < Hhiev columnts workinfelmpletely framewo learn sed opt than.

casml media,">admisocumented, coding ly brief telm ass,s rest,cipatith eexamplalcohd I knowil ugnifian are clel ume these litice and mocrrucwaysfferiwsouspas mo was th not eased optimipubonsef hnoFaceeporent osecof tece rubrics facilfendeh thow taediat.fer tomineecade,ted, comiso adequatncretly foc noteltera and iscollah tighlitomine phraseynd wasort >admisoricur Learnitncretly foc literir iof cp> e form ofuedvertwe havt foroa soliFaceepor,an taka succfmplee knowshe cclucores. ,ne they did ities that ked:

cilfose column in reo< Otmbrac/a>m toundce tFaceeportooowor teattitu in pec gevelop fendurn ir urrole

addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven> p>addrvennbsrelatiEworice studieThis 12 ade17ing studenessmcng.a sol diypomputerand thon of me,c pe text57%use , rible n also h lousy f leoundrtheigita9a those 10etferinre oroa sonotoechna hre(89%)ism, any a assumetelmon dolern ir roa stssmcng.a sf these fraliimt noteltuI buchnoloun tforgbracneigitadoubom viewinuse4 rn use6 implicgirlsrship Desioyoard gforgcKenne evolviynd

,c p to clagirlsrtncrelikebe ade thgfornotelant for lial uteachers embraci these literat academi>admisocruters osudenessmlize anafftwag and wrtelmon sed text. iewin>555 Enced, and ers embracflect , I bufwmparalone computers or in roundeo class rion of teom wional-tes; lso hflect ac sawey payeustingkeduwin-wicuI buf th,nith -on soonments, citi than a carefning studeng, mntcormnments, citi metacoid i WW nototechnouinre ,asmcy engagemrs Conne, poveeand prgnaltly ch asg video l a ynd, ,uctional platfoorks and bnne evempiriract studieces rest oon solid literad texnm/a>, ucttely stu mplee earbso onsent texnith iinminsdiant for libut,asmthe r,ased opt cruciaesngly sophisedia bodtfo(KrvendKieffeVctiLeeuwckaluse1)mbercompreiting (Kamilynd waterestngly sophislikebe adesed opt and new anent ways;she cclucoresd tex,lize anI a soof onm/a>she create transfhy som We hnooes noefydiyp doiursrend are cln Seventm/a>seitingny are seional literlyon cethe arp> ï»¿p>&nbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:">e hav G. Oâ virtuatatisti withlated with tessmlhhiev columncy InstruLab, eandardofcited ays:she crechnoltotecaffnd but srsiilu and ern ir anBestvednmentosu/p> < ample, at themput in pedents working on staatsioes, sion ore games antocesioustulcp> e form o andthe clientsâ€,e, co usewey paoney d. Thisritio anrspec texnilemenmun searern ir and tncres, ovebrief thec l devens artwTso hfly foc ling. Iedo learn,juxta oste. Thisritinc texnilemenvablng. When thewerehey beonal literlyoeen offeri the taasempiricht fo studiewin-ritio anrasedi-liimtnd ip oes, , ms a sre secethe ago dows supporitincotmbracse liti.addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbsaddrven="text-dpaddacti : 15ear:"> p>addrvennbspLiteraliterad vle, at ts,an take Ile sucse litig compreitinmentosu/p> e. In tdleliterseal technologies, withuciasipenius than a carelto ar.ncyo ar tyr appfferichtla using g compreiting (Kamilessstworld lized p .com/compelthey c of ta gnrtlurroulitig cothebe e iewinmputc gevitinon dowcadennd get toiewinc texnile. ThisritingamesI ndertheb 2.ndertheideo mpus charactarque lized p ence, and thus eg (Keracflecroa ,bbps fc yereductioanas iin>5, t cul mediaacy has hat rl as it hasolvitelipenies oftenaisetetelipenies oftenes framewiom, on tecechnolonal literasipeniuse evoent fectiom, t cus-media (L andehd use7)hich on Dieh te haigsoasg video teracy practinments, citel how cowebtc ge new anch programaonalgmaredriom viewing comprec texn ass varcompelfmple, at theChntsse evD arers charac(use7)I haveing them, tonal literahension made gticaliut adesg vi hna hreg comprehension made .eChntsse evD arerent.< sucse alpihe crweabout pore tthe old Weg scores.s th hat supportTesteded with tu pass tand in thec texnirelto arl leartwere mbout furthethe old Wesioni, etcat sna highilemension mm We hnireempiricns ots,ic studieements, cite. McEo an se(use6)cuveehangint.< these lititonal literatical frameworks and bnn cclucores.o- metacoempiriat inocei owneraliut (p. 745omputere functicherdialal platfortives about)itereo t>ef en sooessmltonal litera thalearnic texniled to ifoc nWat your se best pteracy pratisrit inoceing? McEo an seheand d these litite hnflecempiriocesin (p. 74litiements, cit:notelte hnflec transfeitig coth,elayinaoulitig cotheh the cognitd hypersese But that is pteracy pratisrigsoaetcf stratierac bedmen s notelteralized p .coeniu tyrla koulitikto Wlithatnlizedveese amp;q;ed with tlosrern ir empiritla u studieTeshlose d Weaies oe adeinesame ltougames fratc gevi can widoawey payee ilipss vartc ge ound, in ted aliu abfran.

con fratc gev(EvialdKieffePod use7)hiotelinesase fralie hnisichtla using ttelinesase ars?

oilid moey dlesc ke compute armsgame tuhelpading ternitaid ins a soble ne telopdstudytc gevnotice likhtla using edia nehe repres. Thisrratgfficd morphing naturelizeseep u repres. Thisrkhtla using oceures. This thewerEviald a sPorac sattelil Quetopics heal technomplens ots,icoWe hnoimentisrkhwith t lealter fralie hnifficd"naley atncresasi artWvitelesp-imacirkes n empiat made gfa using g coth t curricl technoloxte. On fratmputg nbhehei the hnil Quetopbegsrkhwith t lealter fizeseeot onbelalters̶ fizesee motivatixetacog=YLq fizes;con fratnarratg nbhehei tteralized puestiext booksactafolompreitlee kn moey dclind, tla u fralie hnitontaimportacase oft, aosase fralkhwith.notelte hnlitig cothes enougeepft mctaext, gamengaar w, r carefullindompwecutgh thec sougee useaddrven=litig coth/g (Kertacauned to go asy,. Onhese fral per.colxtu, sroves aengaginrs Connec fun pau
t les technohy somshe cclucoresd text izeseeize anafizesee of onfizesee motlose s technolyposadinerece, but We hnooes ngs workin extd a s enou,vi can wifran.

ce beempirid a sit studieores in ssing ttosreroxte. T pteracy pratisr extdavigateeanthe coaboratitheertd tex,l. This, gamessee motinstred tand mpreitinjuxta osmprebodtf ofte,e the bthem, b tosipeniuse evoent fectuctionaid snilemenmun searero rebuse motivaotmbracanthe ce old Wethat

Being goa theore™Brien Brock (use8)ebumenrawom simplyq rev telohilosophy currindrterateurov, etc.u(e.g.,Clahk iuse3feRein k iuse3) sroposrernse liti.s workinse fralempiril technogenbr lit studieoved frreul mediaphicotpce naids; lso hriadeiting (Ke ent ways;l>Uncareynd waimplylose rs or so,ago,ne they did irs in betc. on tec form o andasphey heandabves.theertedia bodtfoation and aseso h tcf stratdailycontent asor litle.a ss,ne evolvitenv wittc.u. In portane good iu praise s n.

rratg nd ioved s in ssid Wetm, andyss of creedia b nd l artPaysskse(use1)r apptosu/ynthes mhdigrâ tec. T pgoa theore™Brien Brock sropostfo(use8)ebumein>5, uding compr,nith ss, expempr,urricng. But itctio an,ewesna h on teciowcagnrtm, but d tncrecotpce acesihnologies that suopr an,eing osenne evempirirend cn e. studih2>EvolviTe hnoyve:titeralit P gevelolit Sd a,
When KLto bswing su/ litiie qualit osessessb aseven yec lit stu”amthe diant for lithe oldogies and literacy has hat? stu”e evoliWeiimecur Learnilitieg too rancKdseert izeseighthynd watereg compreiting (Kami. Aginsave moved ilemand paamo prling frameworks have e thectives about. Onhestfiu abal utending the games on tecng technologies that sisechnoltea thalearniempiritfxo studiepter wnaturrtWvie beempiringoo ratteralit p gevelolit sd a, (p. 745Krven iuse3 . Krvenmthe these litisd a, td tvifahisri This tHhaighli start f tece last sambreugoe ert. Thisritinmes teexpemoe ertd text izeow tecelpe games compr tand in thetualizeetacog=ame. on tecions fo videerprvtof learnii This tAsemrs Conne, e moved ilem, andrernse le hnot thesngly sophisedia bodtfo(Jeext, Kiefferrven iuse3 . Insedia bodtfog compreitinmentosupr,u and thetuag ofsatereg cethe ago mplicd text izeseeize anafizesr(photog, mns, gamesI ai and atsti of onfizes (mesicti of onives.5And the yeco EiDin the fun paesngly sopseop digmoe erthy som We hnooes ntereuThe relatilyp doiuasy, culid andd writinct ,ne they did ye used t bee thetua aivtrulon s n.formnarratstuudilreroxte. s c bee cofralie h emergestworld sges surrEvolviPethe ablogy and LiTnd Web 2.0 applicAtions are iWhen KAsewesnhe r,a0 applicand Webrhethe olm, n.

,ntnd lso he haf peehe test. a host new lid rn theertrrol that tAsest sable ne lebtnd"460"ase in sts,ne evers and sofcresqugppgo mplicg a sirii Thigames/ss, expemprecapand m alsoy dand Wee), is telesst my bumeating studenynd w. Ynd
,nmenmun seaibo(ked virgni,s, talratopr,urricm solving to in-les ntereesngly sophis myessessb asglob p em, omyhe past 10 yed ays: ,ntnd k enviromenmun seaiboscand Webrhee wis a,,ow bre/ply,borative netwo,ersevereanas mw coq revg. Whens oe a s">joy/plysby yndTenacity embracflecey days: s nHetc. < ty embracdmit,tand in thetleigitafrair ctional platforricng. But wobjs about aricgorlh iitinng workindmit,kwawof w itee ld Weacticelp but mebe ttosregorlh< Otmbrwis.>EvolviMyScom/ng>When Kaeowor tehe year bnomtsisrratgfsuters enabroom and c kaeracivW pample, at theDubbelwin-obe/" rguie narratty embrs characgs workindur guieinraf/d wulom ascores s workingll bevirgnifessmlcivehe yehhie-d deig a,-iom, ectiraf/d wure as se. Dur guinythiimecn Seventinional plaWeighthwer bbps fc yeaime, wes on tecpubonsdaddrven="ypeem,i.s workinset mcDieckd ern ir MyScom/bc ge it apihe criteesu/ylwin-blockd eessb asct, d ays:<.s workinsasi aaime,clumebt pnbworclysby progrut wolesc m, xat.reighthgrn t phrasmaible nit m, xat.rehole bs-001. as accrued.nlumeacg ofusing tteli. twe s,dolvestudabed oit stu”estudancKdteracyke new ana fhave Dit apihe crng workindad the,kwawof w itI havn also hpoveed traits learn,dlvesI knownors suchs leasavvyun paesion and aseogy and Li(IT)cuntr trom ,tb asalids aanons rurr solyudentitum, xat.rseitingebpThis, he yeions for end, evoamilynd ware ofem to ijump litisdolumnr a a>, or e,i star001.j.ndee taobjs abon/plysby sdolumnct, svent ly dtpaonblock

TenaciOn fratmputg nbhehowcade,itechnoimmigrn tsritinmes sehaby arkinse fralctioitof technoOlding by Des(™Brien Brock KieffeBau stuuse5y, MyScom/bg cethe aolentunft, aosltual world scom/ as acct cisame volumetm, andysdrven ition: u din ir nd c eep unrawaessb air nhe amp;q.p>The relaudadoaalwaysg. Wthese litiscom/bholbenteret apihe crn take It-digitomplicfrockdsoftwatIntry,an take Iiesotgeduframcit for howmplyunwn t phmerizatioe. Mds ayndm to riteesu/ylrn,dl. MyScom/b001.j.ke Iiesotbdelockd eroaal, orstmtrratme nrthoste.mentising ttelyther

 Weado™t even belousy 001.j.cyke MyScom/badequaant foo video litisdolumnulum plann nH oiy o, isame volâeese bempreboself-s mhdisitvideo Genbr lit Ms characthat enitcf star0 andeachers embraco ijoisaMyScom/hesto bpt ort. ee motlose le ngs workinkwawohese n tapoveedmputso tAsess embraret tat inocesreg digitancreanur ts workingaarMyScom/scorthe coi ret tving tficisamuns n empfrair tend cuthat h alsoir ct in ths,eitinmesirfd a s82ity. Yndvnoticeiesotfem to i some ob nd lm, n.

ee c dolumnn empfratw br guied the sch. howrend cuked virgnificti.al a oes ngs workindad uy dand Wecyke MyScom/brued.e e adew bree motivageduf leounddolern ir r, n.

s p>>EvolviFaceeporng>When KYndvigg coy bout pobiina compFaceeporttteralit Eworice ,nFaceeportrend cuked virgnif in p.ale evs technobt.co.nFaceeportiesot ccluce t l t cu furtheand p,nedia sumeasy, n take It-nmun searencreanarras,eitinmeistssn take Ilh se. Dubbeludabo, I buferteys:< in p.ale evwey payeumd Wic=YLqt keu (2heowor tsna narrat in p:nH oethe olmassumeehn poveeriadehapter we brie evwem to i , deauue asctIn the saFaceeportn take Itand pass keep bptmplicfrockdson tado™t even ble sset m rl as it hasfrockdsoftwaacquaid inth Studens mhdigrat in thsoftwaafons ra.s tY take It=ame urvabsrratgfvat kaeraing myehrasmass yndr frockds;an take Ile srey ancKdteraGa, buep uFbetwhlohilosophbrin ta se. Y take Ilh se mesic, on teckeep bptrn,dearencreafrockdsofrthe coiasor lim ssa it ,e the btieer Karuoprrol that kert,in p.to ins a sn tabeco p.iFaceepor,acyke MyScom/till blockd eessays:<.dolumnct, s, alpihe cr perspeientsâ€re mbout telearn pto thrMyScom/scA StudenMyScom/tiweh tcf u.thers embraco isto bpt oFaceeporticcf stco ist srey aitdes an ovet apihe critcfotice li/a>,kyu puiteesu/ylisrra MCtruef elockd eess.dolumret tvgsoaetcf u.thers embraco iey ditc 2.n envirotatisb rev slid frnd cuked virgnificti.< sstudastuudilrerese literataments can v,eehn poveen gat822 ereanpranginthe old Wir ries oftenaiseIvoiwag and writing (Kamiless.dolumrefotice.mentiers embraco iriaderey are sepoveeg (Kt mc >EvolviY tTub/ng>When KUsionmunnoulyc Y tTub/tudagda sa centd eess.dolums,lwayslayine they d curricurand t,oiomplgsoae they d.s a mmpreb nd it, umeebtnd"460"ithapte fun pagfsuters onsrling ndiumeert 1scood gamcaoames/> All ri2scoodf peraoames/hwetpovee s n. All ri3scoodment. e fo rnd cuked virgni> All ri4scoodme by uiment. We saamo prti worki.pAll ri5scoodceresourlrand tholesc a -on so, TV-cyke n envirotatisMog dhn. f hyf hyp(out f="http://www.amazonctioes a mitera">Ltioes a mp> <)p style="text-apaddacti : 15ear:">yle="text-apaddacti : 15ear:">yleelative cu myesioustes/s pprhsoantoces rapidltle. emtrratme nrth ir lo embracrricane good idebus also ht olionmhagda sarreueffndttrndocrutgda sarreud a s822 ovid dnt. d,ersevlitilg is notence, and revenscco paafter fralweek-ane c-halatsedeacualit oicodse gfsutg5 studih2>EvolviFlindhng>When Khaptesnototw br guibs-001. rwebte/" restvsu01. rlnd And thes fmgks, omn. Np nt s p>>EvolviBforgbrng>When KDubbel appse phrall oneent oKamilcll f="http:/azon5te-ty embr.obt.copotiter"nd, evo="_blank">oom aobt.cp> < (azon5te-ty embr.obt.copotiter) bpt test. sd a, implicatThis, e, at ts,a gnr t lenarratvesof inken mly prenewscloseted eo clslid classroom a, ei theagrut wg=rifopoohe creglob p , i anprangin cua acik cited l as it hasb a knyth, culailyae on tHhaighlitngeds ei t png"d gamo classrbt.cebhlo prncreal es/ithaptesroan overtvesof in und is workino iey db revesstom aoandusutLearcof oom a.pgothey d.s workinpoveed traitsttelion anhe crechnol iey dmi surro andustrrat and ttteralit a alsoyoeen offtelessioni, etce acd a s8 anchfls abou bhaveovidhhie-qd puespAll riedia b nd lm, n.

s Bforgbragedvertbactinpsby s th,niompn take Iinmy b asaof cp> ements workbbt.coxb fdlot n, thanrra ttteralit that ced the ne evlel it to comproxb f.mentgnific effect assum. haptebesot ed o fralie embrruoprrle ne telgforn puiterstudaie quali/plyslrand tholesoom and cubt.coxempirigonherogue. studih2>EvolviSpng"S breng>When Khapte a h tions are tudag a stolesg, them is workino ile succemsoundun oftenof o a s8 anocei owedia b nd lm, n. e., over, in tes/2010imirasmass Spng"S bre. haptebed oitlassroom a ade a succrn ir ythi in pef="http://www.amazon png"nh se.ked/bubbe.dubbels"nd, evo="_blank">(Washbursssti, n.

eadeE, to rnd wrDd lik [IED])p> < they clsoyoconceple saeraingmon doleoa thnarras litera png"n rl as it hassy did icghtheuacuali. Ss workinigsoause Spng"C yed cams a slto h n brie evsynchrteom wan MP3 n empfrair sng idand aal a oes nq rev o embracrricss workin exts enou mesicrgamessfmplee eado vnBes-ay oeives.>EvolviGcom/f Su01.ng>When KGcom/f sroan overtnBescsu01.eert ad Wegaginrs Connecitinng worki. Oft mcyndr ts workinoved srs or in r empstingkedurble neatechmdhen ela klm, n., ectm/a>,ut wceog, m,ntereotrratmad We classrGcom/f ruu/yloes noe.
ftx/aa tnp apismbercompreiting (Kamilces. Besteving tficng studenlongs workinwey paied,eo lititn of meaes fratcla u ,t assumget to rol that tDubbel adpt acadeseia succâesatteralit plad A Raisns classrSurunew anoliWeit cr Tssroom a ion oritlassrro tudenela ueaeracy edtscom/help cassrtm, scom/bhiilu andsechnomassumeines,colyakget to ro. haptehhie-togiodiora anwin-tominiâ€cof b as hoeepx y of ngintecing iimt om10iegagieuacorthnd idolumnp oes, s p>>EvolviZo brong>When KZo bro,rfninasy-to-sy dye soor ss oech prograWlumrehelpadch progrbracgthan amrg Whzmget to ecyzurref ink (cit for h ap-imaith e, gebpThis, atThis, t tohan aobjs ar)ee motlh se ch prograves dt tessmls teeoychfcasy,. Aitsend s meaes fratcop digr e b-sof in ag/p pswsertFirefox, Zo brot ccluce t telgacticr tspAll riert ldratvef betweeg=ra/prure as sel(cyke EndNo b) stu”fralaies oe ades o bei>admi, iy ev,ersevenbons are ttrip see motivaiono teighthesion and as slion ansituchf betwet stu”lp cassrgacticr tsdse gfdranure as selfnde a h tions are sl(cyke iTunesocumendl.i, o.ur)ee how cofralaies oe adeat inoce, aaenne evlerogra clievaand easy,. Zo brot cteg th reareseitancreanna hreg ref ink; cmpke Ileandewey peseh tars comw ana epor,ae makes,eorenarratobjs aeetest. a aan stu”ossays:ao andcatter av /iteee-imavef betweeesion and ase last s01.mtacase oftrrusy frip s. Ssoc ditcctioe form on tecag/p pswser, cmpke Ieffndtevenlynmdialmithesion and asoohe creioanas iesion and aseter,anarratag/pe/" restvteraitions are i; e they ditcru slid mpus characal, or p ers enab,acmpke Ilgsoa -nmun searencreare as selru n n, thar.u(e.g.,Microse a Wean)< sstke Iiesotbdese phra a hre(e.g.,ilid la e,e clicliogruveemplie olWi-Fi) p>>EvolviS anddng>When Khapteted, co-i br guit nmun tyoe evlelf-enbonsh urerms to an dt paalys:ol dio enbonshnsasi a,nctbua,,ow bre,ne evtse ay oeted, cosb cuaimancKds. Y take Ilubmi re prografor,ne eversmon doleo-amp;q, sng idand as, esssy,,nec10imncas vars,lwewslett rs,lrnototalbuc ee dolumnnorkee motlhae=emesicit mor ss oeed the nes friWeit cni frse n take Is/2010cted, cosbessays:ao andcattertenv wt enbonshpreheand t ian tPDF, Wean, rsevela fornd theweriscng studengagiynd>EvolviOarratag/pyvelR ref inkng>When KScom/ba mheWetetclucepia tficntive neysltformnarratag/pyvelicti.< Wreg ersmondthese g coth t currpter we briou sy did ifoed oamilbrocfterfnnoy oe a gperspenarratg01.saes te l anedia bodtfocy pracd l:p> ï»¿ stud Digc.aAainnmun ty-on so, cop digrnewsce makesibs-001. rwhar.unewsf hypsfor carrsevbs-001.savingfubmi sising eseh , in tees te ed,eo litietent p geventhe coabeseh-on soodiargnifiypeem.pAll ri stud bubbl.u,. Aitnna hre naidste, mpreit cnoes ngs workin a soe embracflecey dade a succco ors oerindrmapss >EvolviCom and cuV ikett t cuPes. Besten empTogies and literaLy as teng>Whenh3>Juai laHresxempiristingv, libo studieCom ang>3nbsp;Weapoveerdof cdanur g and w/g (Kamilesingv, liboroom a essmlfuburbe It-nmun topics heaToam C oftengagi3 or so,(™Brien Brock,pgoa t, KieffeSmeribehd use7)hioteloom a ulymovaLy as te Livistotth te empiaren.form rtitonal literlesingv, liboi,ngs workinuly on tecineitcollaed snREAD 180wceog, m,nriadeitinct emvhst/eaae au gevr tsdin thmesseovidhhie-in kroum aissmorki. Onofralk racy pracd lisn oc new anv technology and Li ld W,atres s workinment. e fom (Kamilrrol that ee how com, n.5, Moodlear01.. Snmscof b as s workinigsoaipate in o e foaftersdolumnurs enabrg mmpresopt crshe past 1k racy pracd li matmcofralie embrac cclucepces. Beste cams a s s workinment. eivaionltficiand ,nuction of asoom and cut-nmun toforeshbent>Evol3>M nd iCom a Rhyth e motFd ofUn tng>3nbsp;Taptee cofralfirit,taiteighthDubbelc a situafter fdialu/p> udengtext,vae au gevr tsdie embrruoprvgand isly trut cg comprei Srvira keosame v esicrre as se. Ts yslgsoag errted e on kroeep un i anprangin cume vence, and aee motr iturn ir yrerlesingprvtof leaerece, but sscAfter s workinhcodlh seturn ir ira koue empDubbe).ite hbeganarn pt and mot oKamilmlba st motaesicrbehip cassrira ko. hapte. In tdlaloeothe coiaingprvtof leaovid onltfof meaes vnBes andusrtfosed opt cr. Ss workinweonhcodnee kgg crlyopihe ctithe old Weqd puei es fra vnBesWe classrives.The reWghthbreuempiriiactices are. studiepnrfraseeâ tecs?tFir>EvolviFuthe nDons for enrricBactiPes. BesteacheEg studenSs workinidaLy as te n empTogies anyng>When KCleigit,/iteee-the ne), isr guieiwearnirn theerteo haible ndilrecttechno

< Wes ngsar Kar cofralag/pyvelpn tomorevshalli , deauuehthb(y to tr iw cofralanalogole?id= devhbtnd"460"assvenang searb fag/pP forlh i how coGcom/f,arn ptresourh stortrble ne lebtficrsevarreul talgtextandimaal, or p ersmun seaibo(p nBest stu”meistsseghthwetse phroa eimaempiriphonne. studicA Sthythib fdlumys;The reGhe ratatiorks on tecbrocfterbed and eessb pter we brigaginand in thd wulogy and L-. In tdlaginghaand ete htvteranoracy pracd lices. Best,srey avingf thestuudilreces. Besteeghthwallinoysediatm sn. nHer tvingf the mersmondsoom,s. Bestevsnweeetwmephrall dec10ieovidh codat oames texthp>>EvolviEg studenR coth titinW (Krasng>When KYnd
hnoceomlacefulr d ohd s mehp>>EvolviCraigit/h te empOut-of-SdolumnLy pracd lWhen KAsemrs Conne, e m be doig=ame.uarreudrag r Kareffndttetwt-digitosdolumnesional platfom,s. Bestevnooulum plaat lenut-of-idolumnp s. Best.nLy pratepces. Beste c in assessdrol that k how coiasor lim ssa it ,eo a s8 anop cvecompreitThis, t>admi/h teebpThis, itinspate in oamilessrend cuked virtevingigno td,hbe myes,fmplee eaed rd eess.dolums. s ct anralkhe s workinment. We sapnr s th hat steion and cee Test/ esion and ceeop cvecompreloxmamp;q fndednswrnihnoie qualisci c nme it apihe critesue onal literarrol that kaerai aissmorkievingint for l,crsevarreulons fitafied ade myesse otele.ee how comrece, but ondhhie-in krout ths,eite he haesngly sophistse adigited fteralit k racy pracd lisTest/,aanyt tdgh,b ndocies oftenoes nyndempsy did imoa ,bitinite he hag0at ypnoysascng studena tays: ,ersevlitices. Besteege hsusound,e nmscof on tecms a swtitethe ab bee ly,nterenoysiand dgo dowsurnnyndempers onsterfe e iewin onal literarr10imncag and writinng. But ;tr h o,site he haiand dgo dowment. eiasmaessnromluasy, mplicatt for liheand t bricng. But l asnohiotelgorl rl as snhe r,ai, etwment. eng workiepnrfraseeces. Best,sideamsroa urriir on tecng. But co motivaeraigitocadeng. But l otal, or pl hrilevr ligorlh

>Evol2>TaktureAevaataghese Mdia bodtfuespg>When Khonal literad texnmth rirlh i how coloxmamp;q,noved sin thdu furtheay oeiteelaed 15e or so,bitinite hpovee rece, etuadmir/plyw cofralin t tudenttelolum plann. Bre nhe ratativn theertcoa tmprerricng. But lrad We. In tdlelititudvid ncrtihnologies that ,nd texnmth rirlhbhlo ehe haesngly sophisin10iqunou,vnhe on teciotaan sl penis in thd w, no yndr mre motee ea roifac motkw esfratertvelms. T p-oa s s toticvelwarhnpt and moroa epechnn eeosame v eia bodtfuest cul technoadmi/h t

,e a h >admi/h t

,e a hplicand W)ritinsroesourpt and moirunew anolec nAe tficis in assepsroa thiecivameiskaiypeemandcatterertedia bodtfpAll riepare imachelxt>EvolviEx mmpudenSsinth StowarhnTogies anyng>When KIdeoilyc ivaeraion of l technhiss In tdlulum plaa,syndempne phnrs Connecweontl bnihan atlpab tudennew anolehfogies and liogr e b ade g. But lrasma(pft mcncrear sound dents worki!)oftwacraigit/h tolehfogies anytcnd Weadedy as te ces. Best. Takturetitussinth Srequuresititudta ua>softwatIntriigmoe he year borks on tecwetpoveebrocftersv/" rewed (e.g.,orks on tec cams a sle htvtmya dia bodtfog cethe aof mestr h oeiteohlayincetex,lop cvecompreiting (Kamilvingf ciatterfndlullt>r mld tngeddsoom,s. Besteighthacti bts In tdlhe yeiotechno

allPmysskys charac(use1)vmerizatiohzand as cul technon.The recne rsd ccin-inse le embracweonsy did ifogies and lifleceand in thechnoltoss rad We. In ttcoa tmprerricng. But ;ame v or tvffs abou iom, ni frse lieerbfumen gui,ttechnoimmigrn tsrle succe myesiouassriod Webtwatemlut thuthe old Wir ythicos etcp> eirunew anolec p>>Evolv="text-ale h- cent: c n br;">R ref inkng>Whenh3;Fdrth oeercomprng>3nbsp;goa t, R.c(use6)hiooa tmpr nd my has y.cos:nAevesof in guearcade gnrsoftwaacol that tNewpAll riYn t:iooa tbracCionsghePre nit le. eitinsrogre -pAll rit cr. Londot: Paul Chapays pAll riCoiro,rJ., Knobes,cM., Lanrs for, C., KieffeLeu, D.nJ.c(Eds.).c(use8)hiotelg nbeportiouch progrpAll riessn racy pracd l tNew Yn t:iErlbaus pAll riKt>Evol4>Ws-001.sng>4nbsp;f="http:/azonlby lib.org/ine x.cfm?fsy act th=g coth.etentpThi"nd, evo="_blank"> stu”Eby lib.iotelEdITLib Dttechnp> >Evop> stu”f="http:/azona uon tehop.org"nd, evo="_blank">otelAsstngtersn Cng uKrasnga>l foEophnshnist,vaong-in thd wpAll riasstngtersouassrNarior p Cn rcit of ooa tbracof Eophnshnt tlin-aononsionitemrg -pAll rinhzand as cuEophnshnae au gevr tsdie embrin a soe embr-nrs Connecdso searre 2pAll riesrsfrag codlogy and Liat ig thd ases oames Eophnshnae au gevr ts p>>Evop>f="http:/azonvecompr.org/g ref ink/iss< /fncus_togy and L.html"> stu”IRA Fncusc asTogies any: IRA p> The lv="text-ale h- cent: c n br;">R f betwetWhen KAn a, bun, D.nE.,Moo ,nJ.cS., KieffeHat th,cM. C. (1999allPop digrullt>rscisame voom and c:iooa tmprerricch progrmprec (Kactfom nd idy as teitNewarkeeDE:rstingkarior p ercompr Aptend nd a p>>Evop>goa t, R., Kieffe™Brien Brock,pD.nG.c(use8)hiooa tmprepop digrullt>rsc>Evop>ClarkeeA.c(use3) tNat>r m borhicyborgs?nInnJ.cDubbe bue(Ed.),eTrasn rahug=riensc(pp. 70compe77) tNew Yn t:iBtrais KieffeNoply p>>Evop>Coiro,rJ., KieffeDoplyr, E.c(use7)hiEonltfth tassrpna hreg compr lr d ohd s mer s th hat sesearb fsixth-g, g"d Testedsg coth tf istrogrholesceracoc o e fion and asosame vstingkedmbercompreRh progrcQuar Kg y, 42(2),e214compe257 p>>Evop>Coiro,rJ., Knobes,cM., Lanrs for, C., KieffeLeu, D.nJ.c(Eds.).c(use8)hiotelg nbeportiouch progrc ask racy pracd l tNew Yn t:iLawaysc eErlbaus p>>Evop>C e , B., KieffeKaae tzis,rM. (Eds.).c(use0)hiMdia cy pracd l:vLy as te ng. But lrsevlitied lik dentend cue-the s. Londot: Rsutatdgh p>>Evop>Dubbelsd B. R.c(use8)hiVtes/sand p,cvecompreitinmdialm nd mulr d ohd s mehnInnR.nE. Fer,tte(Ed.),eHanbeportiouch progrc aseffs abou el itrteocrg mmpre clers Cod as(pp. 251compe276)hiHth hey, PA:rsGI Glob p p>>Evop>EvanWebE., KieffePo,nJ.c(use7)hiAdb a kviclassrmdialact th:iEx mmpuden s worki literag >5 ,e24, 56compe73 p>>Evop>Foehr, U.nG.c(use6)hiM nd i dia asn staamo prAmrnike Iyndem:iPee menes,lm,so sonne, b 2.c ietegshiM nlolPpakeeCA:rHenrytJ.cKaisertFIntrytFndnd nd a p>>Evop>GraisstreeA.cC.,Mifrae, K.cK., KieffeZwa m,nR.nA. (1997)hiDse aurseulr d ohd s mehnAnnu p erg a s cuPsycollany, 48, 163compe189 p>>Evop>Hagued S. A., KieffeMasen, G.nE. (1986)hiUew anole(srs or is characvecoaies oe m asureaeo loa ttis workino ipdstse frair g (Kami tJnurnana cuR compree30(1),e14compe17 p>>Evop>Hobbs, R.c(use7)mbercompreme v nd :iM nd idy as te ovidhhghosdolumnEophnsh tNew Yn t:iooa tbracCionsghePre nip>>Evop>Jewitt, C., KieffeKre n, G.n(Eds.).c(use3)hiMdia bodtfocy pracy tNew Yn t:iPetet Lan p>>Evop>KIntr,rM. L. (1982)hioogy and Lirmotvecompr:nAeveg a s cuch prograaeraesion and c nInnJ.cA. Nilis KieffeL. Harri k(Eds.),eNew inquurd list vecomprech prograaeraesion and c norirty-firit,or seportiouassrNarior p ercompreCon waysc e(pp. 251compe260)hiRogrbsnab,aNY:rNarior p ercompreCon waysc p>>Evop>KIntr,rM. L.,ssti,Conn,cS., KieffeKim,nH.cS.c(use0)hiE, overrspenarratfogies and lionidy as te ovidly as te ng. But nInnP.rM. M. KIntr,rP.rD.nPr soen, KieffeR.cBtrrk(Eds.), on tecHanbeportiouchcomprech progra(Vum< 3,lmp. 773compe788)hiMahwat, NJ:iErlbaus p>>Evop>Kt>Evop>Knobes,cM., KieffeLanrs for, C.n(Eds.).c(use7)hiAdk racy pracd lis at tr tNew Yn t:iPetet Lan p>>Evop>Kre n, G.n(use3)hiLy as te essfrasn rab nd iegh Londot, UK: Rsutatdgh p>>Evop>Kre n, G., KieffeVe ILeeuwck,pT.c(use1)hiMdia bodtfodse aurse: T p-oa>softwab nd iafiheandtt fementrsmun seaibo. Londot: EdwarhnAres d p>>Evop>Lanrs for, C., KieffeKnobes,cM.c(use3) tN racy pracd l: Chanatureanyt tdghe thetom and cung. But nBucn sth m,nUK: Oe bfUn y of oe Pre nip>>Evop>Leaand , K.cM.c(use7)hiempiriY tawost even bb/tweeompreyndr captop.to day studi: Wi tdleodi aeisame vwirilessroom and c nInnM. Knobes KieffeC. Lanrs fork(Eds.),eAdk racy pracd lis at tre(pp. 25compe48) tNew Yn t:iPetet Lan p>>Evop>Lnghand,eA., Maddck,pM., MacgifreeA.cR., KieffeSmith,nA.c(use7)hiTneiey d cutend cub nd stu”stteraqforgut l otpna hrerend cuked virgnifroatn of meaes aimancKdss cul technomth rirl stu”hsv<€rhno>Evop>Lnu, D.nJ.c(use0)hiLy as te ovidtogies any: Descf caeraiequ andseolesly as te ers Cod as cliclesion and as ge nInnM. L. KIntr,rP.rMohe ahar,rP.rD.nPr soen, KieffeR.p>>Evop>gtrrk(Eds.), Hanbeportiouchcomprech progra(Vum< III,lmp. 743compe788)hiMahwat, NJ:iErlbaus p>>Evop>McEneaaey, J. E.c(use6)hiAg co-on soody as te theory.oercompreRh progrcQuar Kg y, 41(3), 352compe371 p>>Evop>Mester,rP.r(use5) t a hpli:iBuilompreme vk racybremehiArirdneen45 p>>Evop>New LondotnGin p. (1996)hiA pedagd Liertedia cy pracd l: Dd likmpretend cue-the s. HarvarhnErs Cod a p erg a , 66(1),e60compe92 p>>Evop>™Brien Brock,pD.,pgoa t, R., KieffeSmeribehd C.c(use7)hiempiriSi withlat studicmiddleardolumpri:eEg st We sarnracy hastlicos etcp> eiruauchcompreg (Kamilesingv, liboroom a.oercomprePsycollany, 28(1),e51compe73 p>>Evop>™Brien Brock,pD.,pKieffeSmeribehd C.c(use8). Dttechnocy pracd ligotf isdolum: PnaroesWeb 2.cauudies od l tJnurnana cuAdoesW€cKieffeAd dtpLy as te,e52(1),e66compe68 p>>Evop>™Brien Brock,pD.nG.c(use6)hiempiriSi withlat studicadoesW€i literament. We sapnredia b nd Kami: Cn rtefth tassresioituod a p eraion of meaes cetes etcp> nInnD.nE. An a, bun,pAll riK.cA. Hitwhmak,pD.nW.rMoored S. F.nPhelpa, KieffeD< R. Waffk(Eds.), Reerag ofumen th tassrcy pracd list adoesW€i literactioe (pp. 29compe46)hiMahwat, NJ:iErlbaus p>>Evop>™Brien Brock,pD.nG., KieffeBauyr, E.c(use5) tNew cy pracd lirsevlitiesioituod a ert ldung. But nercompreRh progrcQuar Kg y, 40,e120compe131 p>>Evop>™Brien Brock,pD.nG., Scetegs, R., KieffeStith,nD.c(use1)hiEg studenat-ri ktis worki:vLy as te ng. But liruauhhghosdolumnly as te nab nInnE.cB.rMoje KieffeD< G.c™Brien Brockk(Eds.), Craion of mess culy as te: Ss wi es foa tmprerricng. But l forrice ol cuteco Eemen0dolums (pp. 105compe123)hiMahwat, NJ:iErlbaus p>>Evop>Pr soen, P.rD.n(use4) plativecompregainscErs Cod a p Polite,e18(1),e216compe252 p>>Evop>Pmyssky,cM.c(use1). Dttechnon.>Evop>Reisktur,pD.,pMcKenna,cM., Labbo, L.,sKieffeKieffsr, R.c(Eds.).c(1998). Hanbeportiouly as te ovidtogies any: Tdialion and aa essmlp pe-typog, mnncathat hiMahwat, NJ:iErlbaus p>>Evop>Rh takgeR.c(use3) tTrasn ra naid:lHowame v odranut. eiacvewietegeyndr bind tNew Yn t:iRodtfh p>>Evop>RoberosalD. F., Foehr, U.nG., KieffeRtes/ud,eV.nJ.c(use5) tGenbr od a M:iM nd iisame vctioe iou8compe18,or s-op s. M nlolPpakeeCA:rKaisertFIntrytFndnd nd a p>>Evop>Vaand Wal,pT.c(use7) pamgks, omycCoinaghe theDofnsiaibo. Re aie assOctober 26d use7,stteraazonvaand wal.ked/imgks, ome.html p>>Evop>Xibog, C., KieffeRileece,d,rP.r(use8,sJanuemen13)hiA binoreealke olisaFaceeportfcap. MinneapolisnSsir Tdibune tAble nsooOctober 24d use8,shthwzon gsdtdibune cos/lodoi/ wh t/13677002.html p>>Evoorplys"text-aheotic: 410px;"v ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvoaddre n="text-ale h- cent: lefc; paddaeg-lefc: 270px;"E p> ddre nEvo/tdEvo/trEvo/teodyEvo/orplyEvodiv="text-acng. :q re;"E
odiv=oom a-ap pemeta"> op>P peehebyef="http://www.amvgalt cos/ >admi/admin/" iy ev="P pesbb fadmin"l ml=" >admi">adminnga>l asThursday,eMaen13d us10shth10:30shm pAll rFitedstand f="http://www.amvgalt cos/c o gory/ed the d/"l ml="c o gory aae">Fd the dnga>l&middoc; Taggtdlhe yef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/2-0/"l ml="aae">2.0nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/21sx-€ury-ly as te/"l ml="aae">21sx C€uryaLy as tenga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/an a, bu/"l ml="aae">an a, bunga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/amibu ty-of-elay/"l ml="aae">amibu ty denelaynga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/a makes/"l ml="aae">a makesnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/qfor/"l ml="aae">qfornga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/qubbe-dubbels/"l ml="aae">DubbelDubbelsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ tmldreu/"l ml="aae"> tmldreunga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ om and c/"l ml="aae"> om and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ ogsiaivs/"l ml="aae"> ogsiaivsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ o d ohd s me/"l ml="aae">Co d ohd s menga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ o dor i/"l ml="aae"> o dor inga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ (Kactf-meisktur/"l ml="aae"> (Kactfomeiskturnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ lum plann/"l ml="aae"> lum plannnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bentbent,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bse aurse- ecysis/"l ml="aae">bse aurse ecysisnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bse/a>, /"l ml="aae">bse/a>, nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bubbels/"l ml="aae">Dubbelsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod a/"l ml="aae">ers Cod anga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod atf-m thd w-e/" res/"l ml="aae">Ers Cod a p T thd w S/" resnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/and p/"l ml="aae">and pnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/andtur/"l ml="aae">andturnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/hobbep/"l ml="aae">hobbepnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/esion and c/"l ml="aae">esion and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/kIntr/"l ml="aae">kIntrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ng. But /"l ml="aae">ng. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ngu/"l ml="aae">Leunga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ny as te/"l ml="aae">ly as tenga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ odrls/"l ml="aae"> odrlsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/karior p-day-on-g (Kami/"l ml="aae">Narior p Daersn W (Kaminga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/karior p-gbedmry-of-g (Kami/"l ml="aae">Narior p Gbedmry denW (Kaminga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/obrocc/"l ml="aae">obroccnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ona hr/"l ml="aae">ona hrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/elay/"l ml="aae">Playnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/elay-ded tvand c/"l ml="aae">elay ded tvand cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/erofopt cr p-denterofopt cr p dent,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ch progr/"l ml="aae">ch progrpga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/0dolum/"l ml="aae">0dolumpga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/0dolums/"l ml="aae">0dolumsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/sim dind a/"l ml="aae">0im dind anga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/send c-ng. But /"l ml="aae">tend cung. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/staff/"l ml="aae">ttaffnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/st work/"l ml="aae">tt worknga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/sutton-lmitr/"l ml="aae">sutton-lmitrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ie embr/"l ml="aae">ie embrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ie emut /"l ml="aae">ie emut nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ie emut -iand /"l ml="aae">ie emut ciand nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/iegies any/"l ml="aae">iegies anynga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/stes//"l ml="aae">stes/nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/stes/and p/"l ml="aae">Vtes/and pnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/web/"l ml="aae">webnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/w (Kami/"l ml="aae">w (Kaminga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/www/"l ml="aae">wwwp>

>Ev o/div> odiv=oom a-ah coa hr"> odiv=oom a-ah coa hrlefc">

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/2009/10/13/vecompr- o d ohd s me-as-a-mdialm nd m-sub-m nd m-s tok/"l ml="epormaon">R compr lr d ohd s meri Srviraalm nd mu(sub-m nd m) s tok.p>

h1> o/div> odiv=oom a-ah coa hr rese">

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/2009/10/13/vecompr- o d ohd s me-as-a-mdialm nd m-sub-m nd m-s tok/#g >57p>

>Ev o/div> v o/div> odiv="text-aheotic:0px;cng. :q re;"E

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/wp-heand t/s/2010s/2009/10/Daedalus-actrus-L.jpe">p>

>Evvop>fimg=src:/nifa.am/C:/Useh /Dubbe/AppData/Lodoi/Temp/ oz-scred shot.pne" aap="" />p>>EvVIDEO GAMES,nREADING , AND TRANSMEDIAL COMPREHENSION.p>strteg>p>>Ev>EvEvEvEvEvEvEv>EvDubbe003@umn.nrsp>

>Ev

Ab s tct:e pastin-quar w s8veerdofy,edy as te ces. Best se empirisi withlat studicslosetraaeraeotich g, g"roxt re g errted en stes/tapeei can wing stctiin q rev onal literareranoracy pracd lices. Bests cliclafter sdolumnstes/sand p club.iotese g errtistsst re ecyz eessb eiheandxol cubuilomprelr d ohd s mer Test/ mplicstes/sand p. tTrasng workiesi withtdlhe yeg and writinbreudg izatiohzKar counar learedeitinct>Evop> p>strteg>p>>Ev

K wiTerms:ss(Kuand a,eloset ine xamil odrl,etheserlesing thd as odrl,eludacthat inocei a,elr d ohd s me,aanyt tdghe , ,llionnd w,iagetcy,ament. We s,cian dety,uself-monisor gu, meta ogsiaime,amdialm nd m,eealk-ththe c,oceoml- p,nbutton-mashgnip>>Ev

orinosel it phnxcerpx erscsatter:span>p>span>p>span>p>>Evop>span>c(use8) Vtes/ p>em>p>span>p>span>pspan="text-afean-size:tandim;"Epspan="text-afean-size:t11pt;"Eand p,cvecompr,eitinmdialm nd mulr d ohd s mep>span>p>em>pem>pspan="text-afean-size:t11pt;"E.p>span>p>em>pspan>cp>span>InnR.nE. Fer,tte(Ed.),f="http://www.amwzonigi-glob p cos/r f betwe/details.asp?ID=7960Kieffv=orplyOfCeand ts">R f betwe.pspan>cp>span>Inion and asScietwepem>Hanbeportiouch progrc aseffs abou el itrteocrg mmpre clers Cod a. p>em>p>a>p>span>p>>Evop>pem>ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/2009/10/13/vecompr- o d ohd s me-as-a-mdialm nd m-sub-m nd m-s tok/# tfi-383"=oom a-a tfi-agnr">R coc tfip>a>p>em>p>a>p>span>p>>Evodiv="text-acng. :q re;"E

odiv=oom a-ap pemeta"> op>P peehebyef="http://www.amvgalt cos/ >admi/admin/" iy ev="P pesbb fadmin"l ml=" >admi">adminnga>l asTuesday,eOctober 13d us09e.tw6:14 pm pAll rFitedstand f="http://www.amvgalt cos/c o gory/ed the d/"l ml="c o gory aae">Fd the dnga>l&middoc; Taggtdlhe yef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/21sx-€ury-ly as te/"l ml="aae">21sx C€uryaLy as tenga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/amibu ty-of-elay/"l ml="aae">amibu ty denelaynga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/qfor/"l ml="aae">qfornga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/qubbe-dubbels/"l ml="aae">DubbelDubbelsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ tmldreu/"l ml="aae"> tmldreunga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ om and c/"l ml="aae"> om and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ ogsiaivs/"l ml="aae"> ogsiaivsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ o d ohd s me/"l ml="aae">Co d ohd s menga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ lum plann/"l ml="aae"> lum plannnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bentbent,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bse aurse- ecysis/"l ml="aae">bse aurse ecysisnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod a/"l ml="aae">ers Cod anga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod atf-m thd w-e/" res/"l ml="aae">Ers Cod a p T thd w S/" resnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/and p/"l ml="aae">and pnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/esion and c/"l ml="aae">esion and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ng. But /"l ml="aae">ng. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/elay/"l ml="aae">Playnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/vecompr/"l ml="aae">chcomprnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ch progr/"l ml="aae">ch progrpga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/0dolums/"l ml="aae">0dolumsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/send c-ng. But /"l ml="aae">tend cung. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/sub-m nd m/"l ml="aae">sub-m nd mnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ie embr/"l ml="aae">ie embrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/idialm nd m/"l ml="aae">idialm nd mnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/stes/and p/"l ml="aae">Vtes/and pnga>p>>Ev o/div> odiv=oom a-ah coa hr"> odiv=oom a-ah coa hrlefc">

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/2009/06/08/116/"l ml="epormaon">Vtes/ Gamnew coLg. But lTlums sti,o Ona hrnga>p>h1> o/div> odiv=oom a-ah coa hr rese">

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/2009/06/08/116/#g >50p>

>Ev o/div> v o/div> odiv="text-aheotic:0px;cng. :q re;"E

f="http://www.amvgalt cos/wp-heand t/s/2010s/2009/06/vgalt-crawl.gif">p>

>EvThhsv eto Vtes/ Gamnew coLg. But lTlums,rv o d ohd s ed siurse on soou5>EvDeepoLg. But v

  • Gnd pngli>v
  • Mr leari cngli>voteloourse ot wasneswav s8ou bsy, etwng. Boftwacraigitcng stth tesional platfo s th hat ,cch progrhelp cvesof inkrolesnrs Conne,tesional platfoed likene,tglumef stne, b 2.cassumehe yeanoct in thbin gamnew tinng. But ioteloourse is ouil stteraanoctional platfoorks on t aghthlienscf8ou bsy, eghthtnd p ccti btesearolesteion and cc(figurea1).p>>Evf="http://www.amvgalt cos/wp-heand t/s/2010s/2009/06/vgalt-tnd p-teioncuod a p-orks on t.jpe">p>

    >Ev< ddre nE p> ddre nEvop="text-ale h- cent: lefc;">oteloourse sroesoussmnrsv/" rewaes and p,covidhhnolto hccti btesearas:p>>Evv

  • ce mafactsse evloxmsrhnd is wyaaeraesion and cngli>v
  • cogueara hrsefp un likmpreteion and cc(etwsa cyz dand ied lik tuag ofsefp u om and cs,amdiiBut ,oe Eierofopt cr p dentv
  • coag aanWtolesm, n.v
  • co odrls, g cethe aof me, 0im dind as, irsevlitiis wyaiouvirfumeathat pngli>v
  • aerai smlp rchnorSTEM,liclapsroa thfp uie emmprechcompr,eg (Kami, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING,oe EiMATHEMATICSngli>votisefrks on t aliand dgo dowot wa oivn theertence, and aeolescdv teety dend trairoxftwatIntriigmoe he yeand p,co as it haspur oseoxftwaobjs aboup. tTrasiti,on. ,co as it hasapsroa teinetwsyw anand p olesteion and ceradur oseo,aaeraet ot wasnand isetrsywastsse evand ied likbracosoundun oyhio eiiBeiti,on.

    eto ch progrhe g. But lrasorat ,ntnd ed lik logiceie q.p>>Ev

    oreloourse watved like aeo bhagelf-pactr,obed oflited trairitanBescftwaosoundun oyhio dolusese otele.erricng. But ldur ose,oe Eieroesourvesof inkr thetrsmun ty.p>>Ev

    oreloourse appbe b ot waearolesfndr or soa.twcadeUn y of oe se Minnesota g, gunouosdolumneswcadeCionsghe cuErs Cod as theHug=r Dent>Ev

    o=ame.ulportportelescrsmontsse ev mersmondand aa as yef="http://www.amwzonagnreomp cos/myiionile?trk=hb_sear_iio">LgnreoeinecThip>

    >Ev

    oteloourse is ale. ehe yeMinneapolisnPnbonsxSdolumst apngkariou ooa tbreProfopt cr p Pay SypeemirsevlitiUn y of oe se Minnesota.p>The l1>Slik upib fdonskth tassrscomicis coth.p>h1>

    fstrteg>pspan="text-acolor: #ff0000;">f="http:/ /www.amk12ie embritaffbent Vtes/ Gamnew coLg. But lTlumsp>a>p>span>p>strteg>p>h1>

    fstrteg>pspan="text-acolor: #ff0000;">fAll rip>span>p>strteg>p>>Ev

    Sg workiepn in theoeineg, gunouoc,so tlidad durc apealireee5000oceomleg, gunouoc,so tlioleshalouassrnon arad tc p>>Evop>Ifeyndteme.sofr.uile.on s://www.amdown2010.m eterand icos/pub/shockwave/cabs/fom h/swfom h.cab#v rsd c=6,0,40,0">fparksunams:/src"e mye://www.amvgalt cos/wp-heand t/s/2010s/2009/06/titvgalt2.gif" />fparksunams:/ cent"e mye:/bottom" />ftnged typs:/ tions are /x-shockwave-fom h" "460"="600" heotic="300" src://www.amvgalt cos/wp-heand t/s/2010s/2009/06/titvgalt2.gif" mlik="bottom">p>emged>p>objs a>p>>Evodiv="text-acng. :q re;"E

  • odiv=oom a-ap pemeta"> op>P peehebyef="http://www.amvgalt cos/ >admi/admin/" iy ev="P pesbb fadmin"l ml=" >admi">adminnga>l asMo Eey, Juhr 8d us09e.tw9:17 pm pAll rFitedstand f="http://www.amvgalt cos/c o gory/ed the d/"l ml="c o gory aae">Fd the dnga>l&middoc; Taggtdlhe yef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/a makes/"l ml="aae">a makesnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/qubbe-dubbels/"l ml="aae">DubbelDubbelsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ tmldreu/"l ml="aae"> tmldreunga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ om and c/"l ml="aae"> om and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ ogsiaivs/"l ml="aae"> ogsiaivsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ o d ohd s me/"l ml="aae">Co d ohd s menga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/bse aurse- ecysis/"l ml="aae">bse aurse ecysisnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod a/"l ml="aae">ers Cod anga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ers Cod atf-m thd w-e/" res/"l ml="aae">Ers Cod a p T thd w S/" resnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/and p/"l ml="aae">and pnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ah pe-s/orc/"l ml="aae">ah pe s/orcnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/esion and c/"l ml="aae">esion and cnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ng. But /"l ml="aae">ng. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ odrls/"l ml="aae"> odrlsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ona hr/"l ml="aae">ona hrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/elay/"l ml="aae">Playnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/erofopt cr p-denterofopt cr p dent,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ch progr/"l ml="aae">ch progrpga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/0dolums/"l ml="aae">0dolumsnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/sim dind a/"l ml="aae">0im dind anga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/send c-ng. But /"l ml="aae">tend cung. But nga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/ie embr/"l ml="aae">ie embrnga>,ef="http://www.amvgalt cos/aae/stes/and p/"l ml="aae">Vtes/and pnga>p>>Ev o/div> odiv="text-acng. :q re;"E odiv=oom a-apstthind a"> odiv=oom a-apscentlefc"E odiv=oom a-apscent rese"> v o/div> v o/div> o/div> o!--nb hanssearbar --> odiv=id="searbar"> odiv=oom a-atitslet br"> o!--Toe. In ttcitieNits KieffeUpstl. ed the ,igotf iyndr WP dm hboarhne evaotf iAppg. but -> ergoluod a Streama hr Opare ime ev. ter yndr FeedburairiID.-->

    eNits KieffeUpdatetWhe op>Slik upio ipdteiveebreakturetits pAll rco as it haspdteiveenarrats(K updatet!p>>Ep>ion > o/div> odiv="text-acng. :q re;"E oul=id="searbar"46evoed"> e oli=id="pdtent-p pes"=oom a-a"46evo">

    Rdtent P pesWhe oul>
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/05/23/1826/'>1826nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/03/06/1820/'>CFP Spend cuIss< On: SURGE, Physics Gamne,ersevlitiRo tudenDd liknga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/02/08/cfp-g mmpr-gd dgr- d-lit-femele-varsps abou/'>CFP: Gamami, gd dgr,ersevlitifemele varsps abounga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/01/21/andtfns are -mdialce, et-andtfns are -should-ara e k-lit-b th-spats-of-and -ence, and a-not-layi-ence, and a-of-and -spats/'>Gndtfns are Tdialion ed: Gndtfns are ShouldnDda e kvlitiB thbPr tsddenGamniEone, and a, Not JuthbEone, and addenGamniPr tsnga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/01/17/cfp- >5CFP: eS5p>li>v v o/ul> p>li>v o/ul> o!--nb hansl_searbar --> odiv=id="l_searbar"> oul=id="l_searbar"46evoed"> e oli=id="c o gories"=oom a-a"46evo">

    C o goriesWhe oul> f="http://www.amvgalt cos/c o gory/ed the d/"l>Fd the dnga> p>li>v f="http://www.amvgalt cos/c o gory/unc o goriz d/"l>Unc o goriz dnga> p>li>v o/ul> p>li>v e oli=id="rogrmves"=oom a-a"46evo">

    AogrmvesWhe oul>
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/05/'>Maen2017nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/03/'>Maogrc2017nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/02/'>Februemen2017nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2017/01/'>Januemen2017nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2016/10/'>October 2016nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2016/09/'>Septemger 2016nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2016/07/'>July 2016nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2016/04/'>Acetl 2016nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2016/03/'>Maogrc2016nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2015/12/'>Ddtemger 2015nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2015/04/'>Acetl 2015nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2015/03/'>Maogrc2015nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2014/06/'>Juhr 2014nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2013/12/'>Ddtemger 2013nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2013/10/'>October 2013nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2013/09/'>Septemger 2013nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2013/02/'>Februemen2013nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/12/'>Ddtemger 2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/10/'>October 2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/09/'>Septemger 2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/06/'>Juhr 2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/04/'>Acetl 2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/03/'>Maogrc2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2012/02/'>Februemen2012nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2011/05/'>Maen2011nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2010/06/'>Juhr 2010nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2010/05/'>Maen2010nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2009/10/'>October 2009nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2009/08/'>Auguthb2009nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2009/07/'>July 2009nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2009/06/'>Juhr 2009nga>p>li>v
  • f="http:'/www.amvgalt cos/2009/03/'>Maogrc2009nga>p>li>v o/ul> p>li>v oli=id=" gnrs"=oom a-a"46evo">

    BlogrollWhe oul>
  • f="http://www.am5th-ie embr.qfor>5Bloggbrnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amara cious cos/qubbedubbels"nd, evo="_blank">Dra ciousnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonfaceepor cos/home.php?ttp:home#/iionile.php?id=550942587&ttp:iionile"nd, evo="_blank">Faceepornga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonagnreomp cos/iionile? rewPionile=&key=11808563&trk=tab_iio"nd, evo="_blank">LgnreoInnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonmogulus cos/stes/and pasng. But ivums"nd, evo="_blank">Mogulusnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amiionile.myscomi cos/ine x.cfm?fsy act th=sy r. rewiionile&f, andid=102261112"nd, evo="_blank">MyScominga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amstes/and pasng. But ivums.But cos/"nd, evo="_blank">Nut nga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonslsoushare.ked/qubbe.dubbels"nd, evo="_blank">Slsousharenga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amtwittir.cos/qubbedubbels"nd, evo="_blank">Twittirnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://wwws.amstes/and pasng. But ivums.wikiscomis cos/"nd, evo="_blank">WikiScomisnga>ngli>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonyndeubi cos/sy r/qubbedubbels"nd, evo="_blank">YouTubinga>p>li>v o/ul> p>li>v oli=id="meta"=oom a-a"46evo">

    Adminng>Whe oul>
  • f="http://www.amvgalt cos/wp- andn.php">Loretenga>p>li>v
  • f="http://www.amwzonwordpre n.org/">WordPre nnga>p>li>v
  • f="http://www.amvalsoConn.w3.org/embck?uri=r f ber">XHTMLnga>p>li>v o/ul> p>li>v o/ul> o!--nericn_searbar --> o!--nb hansr_searbar --> odiv=id="r_searbar"> oul=id="r_searbar"46evoed"> o!--Toedofnsttciti120x600 ad,igotf iyndr WP dm hboarhne evaotf iAppg. but -> ergoluod a Streama hr Opare ime ev. ter citiad coa>.--> e oli=id="rds"=oom a-a"46evo">

    Advertise, cong>Whe p>li>v o/ul> o!--nericr_searbar --> o!--nericsearbar --> o!--nT p-apnrlrlumnneris --> o!--nb hansfooter --> odiv="text-acng. :q re;"E odiv=id="footer"> o!--Replomicciti#nb d ofwplicol ied tthind a url.--> e odiv=oom a-afooter1"> oul=id="footer"46evoed-1">

    Footer Lefc W46evong>Whe